Eli Zaretskii writes: >> ++++ >> +*** The command 'shr-browse-url' now supports custom mailto handlers. >> +Clicking on or otherwise following a 'mailto:' link in a HTML buffer >> +rendered by SHR previously invoked the command 'browse-url-mailto'. >> +This is still the case by default, but which function is invoked can >> +now be customized via the user options 'browse-url-mailto-function' >> +and 'browse-url-handlers'. > > I'd rephrase the last sentence like this: > > This is still the case by default, but if you customized > 'browse-url-mailto-function' to call some other function, it will > now be called instead of the default. Should it not also mention browse-url-handlers as per the attached? > Also, the "+++" means the change is documented in some manual, but no > changes for the manual are part of the patch, so I guess you meant > "---" instead. Oops, I misremembered "+++" as meaning "all necessary doc changes made" instead of just "doc changes made". >> +** EWW >> + >> ++++ >> +*** The command 'eww-follow-link' now supports custom mailto handlers. >> +Clicking on or otherwise following a 'mailto:' link in an EWW buffer >> +previously invoked the command 'browse-url-mailto'. This is still the >> +case by default, but which function is invoked can now be customized >> +via the user options 'browse-url-mailto-function' and >> +'browse-url-handlers'. > > Maybe we should point to the SHR entry instead of repeating almost the > same text. Sure, how's this?