From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41531: 27.0.91; Better handle asynchronous eldoc backends Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:24:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2nugb78.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875zckuet9.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgecssch.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuynsdp6.fsf@gmail.com> <5d768a69-3574-10c5-e80a-8ab77ec60462@yandex.ru> <87h7umop62.fsf@gmail.com> <671983cf-e4f5-f128-541b-ceac793f35e5@yandex.ru> <877dvfiofy.fsf@gmail.com> <064d8696-a62f-bae2-de26-9bea8c325cd0@yandex.ru> <875zazgcug.fsf@gmail.com> <462a9e0b-0393-d4d3-0793-f43176519f9c@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26110"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 41531@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , andreyk.mad@gmail.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 08 01:26:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jswyd-0006h5-1B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 01:26:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jswyb-0006SB-Bq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jswyQ-0006Pj-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jswyP-000398-OE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:26:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jswyP-0003nl-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 23:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41531 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41531-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41531.159416431214539 (code B ref 41531); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 23:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41531) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2020 23:25:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jswxc-0003mR-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f43.google.com ([209.85.128.43]:38179) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jswxX-0003m0-71 for 41531@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id f18so1043062wml.3 for <41531@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:25:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hHLxnx8nyngEprDMbgUhDpwfukaPRT64QSt2P1M2iK8=; b=ttKPcjfqbU2GIdSSTXMLN86UsT6o4yhynfYN4XgJNTlKCKKATPMmE/mxSnAjET1knR eXqHzGDYIRCbY9b/3b6D8c/unx99widyRjiTyOqGrk4lsw59T+2i27L9hax8Q+rmOzpQ tmMbSKb/LkVBH6Ne5QHo73QzVFIaBWGW5rs+AjvApTqMXcV17J+Qbtm47wd/zPtvqsE3 FBdIT3H7b9jbcaYvMCSDgk8dCrF3+OoyXa68JGbXi9OU7Kd5WsqOxmqyNfB6ut+e17rs D3uUBMaFxqoP5ratg8SmJ6GRhJlCmXs4wPRZ4ROGbOR8Ko2UKSCyCTj2IvJ9BA7qAjmM +6PQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hHLxnx8nyngEprDMbgUhDpwfukaPRT64QSt2P1M2iK8=; b=I8wkVI+SlX+a66vnGKTlNhrCWb5amErhuolZR9Spnlb/t6GiAGuKGaTEOxU4ggDJ7V p/+iJnyuWvvxUYdT/BieDJdhVJYw4ywRorguqSBjFAN6L6DcOIUv73W7hxwlV7GYhxnd 6azVP3AvOqIwYnuLjrY1NhslPZYAgKT1Wc5E1g+nnGFfY7DdHWPiZ33j5lekc74jXVO0 EzpGt0Y6qBQ1y9EZoUZGhwfr7TKZZOAnzd84+oleRqci7W5RAw3d2tx9D99ugItw3Qir iTWR6KMHr7JSJLwbsfizNnrAAf8gxE1tlfbdc10bTFe9dw11eUAcMRjpksnNpg4ueveD L9Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bOTUpDv5Iv+QnjrLPWePHUhxJSiyckGKP/SgvWc6mGq55VA3A 8FVxRix6YhBpcb5vEH0FcJQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3hlG+0sGLSq0N8dNiLmartdme4M4xwSQo7zG9tbgZAV9f5jhKh/0qWBrDYyeeLYPpPYUNQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd09:: with SMTP id f9mr6674049wmj.160.1594164301309; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from krug ([89.180.149.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z63sm3168830wmb.2.2020.07.07.16.24.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:25:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <462a9e0b-0393-d4d3-0793-f43176519f9c@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 8 Jul 2020 02:00:08 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182820 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 08.07.2020 01:49, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora wrote: >> The rest of your long email hints that you've misunderstood what this >> change to Eldoc is accomplishing. > > So basically you even refuse to discuss the design choices in the > branch, or the shortcomings of the implementation, its current bugs, > etc? I read your email, but it's very hard to follow your verbal conjectures that this here or that there will fail catastrophically. I suggest you make a bug report for each bug, describe a recipe for reproducing the bug. Likewise, if there are shortcomings in the design, state clearly what you wanted do, but can't. I promise to attend to them, time permitting. It's important to disconnect these reports from your fondness for futures, which is a technique for which we don't have a library or consensus for. That in particular makes your otherwise extremely valuable feedback very hard to follow. Let's take Stefan's advice on the futures front, is my recommendation. Also, I agree with Stefan that things have become tense and agressive, and no good progress can be made in these conditions. Best, Jo=C3=A3o