From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46351: 28.0.50; Add convenient way to bypass Eshell's own pipelining Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:33:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2fwcg2z.fsf@gmx.de> References: <878s812c6a.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87eehsz170.fsf@gmx.de> <874kin1z2x.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87ft26etuh.fsf@gmx.de> <877dnizb4t.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10524"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46351@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 10 12:34:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9nlJ-0002cZ-S0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:34:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37674 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9nlI-0004HL-Mj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9nkw-0004HD-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9nkw-0004Ld-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9nkw-0003SP-F9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46351 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46351-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46351.161295683513276 (code B ref 46351); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46351) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2021 11:33:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55593 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9nkp-0003S4-Dv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:33:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:33515) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9nkl-0003Rp-RR for 46351@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:33:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1612956822; bh=RE5pQf4LZ6b0th5G/BtOFsI5ndeTnMMQtCBTsUDn/h4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=MloLa3uvekUxYhH7o3JgqJYnEPgfDn2RmmPmym6muZM8MW/ubO0HnFQ2XZAZDQCs8 tWhy9c6DVEgoyREzSrECKEL6DW1tZbZESfeiLNiCxQ6OQPrPSksyS5oxlE6DD25ivu 1bOJg2h6hv2ExrwW01JrW2Hxk0plqccf6B+84jVU= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([79.140.117.252]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MGhuK-1l4uCl3biE-00DlKb; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:33:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877dnizb4t.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> (Sean Whitton's message of "Mon, 08 Feb 2021 11:07:30 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:XEhctSqB9JvlWvJS+TWVWGcxrWtgPii0Ch0sWY0pCjfsumhQtG8 yfUSdED8OnRTax2+vEkH07mygfZ2A0FD5ixA4JvE1O+xEvzeqpgWQv8Na9Y/k53LCh94S2u Z+KP2nfc+By/HQikdFKQq+IJOLT7dolMdy5c9pLkkJfyvZdzTipc+RUt1ff67592xKHE4M+ bx9xOtVbfnMaeWaxvNhvg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:55Ob/gkYaGE=:XXPnWfu8SdkCvE4I1FY6bG ihqF2tsWJe7FEe7+BcT4ve272OTk3SWmSGdPw5LfsVWc0/4wwUHbF4CSwrymWAT2Uijt8gasF 1lh0zJhL2NzkowPT4lHdFsJW0Y/qfqUd9Rw2hL/pUboUT5f6l2hN1jJ2i9+6Exma2YI9xFaes o1JX7/hu9aUMtVLhRr6wiHYIVevBAfaLAMNU1KWbdu2Awk0XsylR+PtF3cFVOuQpvclGg9Aj1 kX00zbrFmUPsosREru7BJMYtzogIURKmvEOipJHCK6gQkWto3+XmPHwDAELiWDQOGfL5LaSCU /Z+YYHVat04VdFtVBp6x4SRGRpmv0kqS9+hRkNPTcFduyDQgVRyIZAIjXcArkwSU3zLgNx+xN bZPeVYidqidYjqRf2icdOPzzg+Qb31pUvPF6xd+XfICOzuN/kmlbCEU7AGLWfbySWfHtOYTTK rday3vz3L4Sj1kG/iGosnkMsiK3+eNkXg54XSujeS2Me1Vdud26zIfxvMwjp/T2OMOU1hXFBM PErAdsOLFKaXp5ACQvcouSC5fAB0GRQrdgbbe9BuFqRtrLvJ6NEvT7d3Rz8voSTv55J8KMKNs 0QVxmfDp0Vkv2kTbC5pU2QKxY1uqIyCN5hddxP0F3BNnEN6uexl+o6xzi80knW1jNbyLch5A6 1bghucyb5aSRfqaPCogH62Mllt/2zMx5QrV5ozuB92rSvzl6lCo0yUQdDt6qLSMll3pRWPO/D 76TDEuG8L+BSJMBeH1Mr0qaDP5VIKPYfRtfaJ+iMORprbTcGp8HfISAtfhe+m18ZW72vejGQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199766 Archived-At: Sean Whitton writes: > Hello, Hi Sean, >> That works. Maybe we could add it to the defaults. But at least I would >> like to see it documented in the eshell manual, otherwise nobody will >> know the effect of "!!". > > I was waiting to document it in the manual based on what others thought > the defaults should be. If neither hook is added by default then I > think the docstrings of the functions that I've already written are > adequate documentation. Sure. But the manual needs an explanation of "!!". > What do you think about adding only the eshell-expand-input-functions > hook by default, versus adding both of them? I think that adding both > is probably most useful to most people, but it has the potential to > break existing uses of eshell-expand-input-functions in people's > configs. Honestly, I'm not a heavy eshell user, so I don't know whether it will disturb people. If you don't feel comfortable with these changes by default, you might move them to an own eshell module, people would load if they like. Best regards, Michael.