From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36649: 27.0.50; pure space and pdumper Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 16:15:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2cdjvjh.fsf@gnus.org> References: <4c1248b8-88cc-ca06-6bc8-9f0bb9a98c98@cs.ucla.edu> <87mtt0hupl.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtt02dyz.fsf@gnu.org> <877dk3hoko.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2cjg9mu.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6oz3lpm.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf8jg8o2.fsf@gnus.org> <838s4j3l2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7j7g7ft.fsf@gnus.org> <878s4jg67i.fsf@gnus.org> <834kf73iim.fsf@gnu.org> <874kf7g54z.fsf@gnus.org> <8335ur3hu8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6oy20bj.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6oupzn1.fsf@gnus.org> <85567d83-7ec6-c5e7-81f2-74b0b310eefc@cs.ucla.edu> <83k0nxu062.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12581"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Paul Eggert , rpluim@gmail.com, stefan@marxist.se, schwab@linux-m68k.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, pipcet@gmail.com, 36649@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 17 16:17:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lie3U-00032p-0Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 16:17:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47894 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lie3T-0006M6-1d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lie3K-0006Ir-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lie3K-00087l-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lie3K-0004RK-2p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 14:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36649.162126096214478 (code B ref 36649); Mon, 17 May 2021 14:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2021 14:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53316 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lie2M-0003l7-38 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58102) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lie2J-0003e2-FZ for 36649@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:15:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=b5/yGqxTZJkWt+fDn61VaMC0eUU1tH5QwbNbIJiLu1k=; b=hequGs79tAtI4X2sqjA77OoKRO YaKtzaOhoyMcdz1gIOr2clf2+SSWcWE9GHnNrNB1/eQEBHZeD3Dm5lg9izX1qaIFsANgYI/TFnRk5 20em9I0FlD8A6O2c/h7sxD6OcCrtqWFcZPsAiaAXnKG5bH3Cp+CFbxjStWwYA817D0l4=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lie27-0000Jt-IQ; Mon, 17 May 2021 16:15:49 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEVIbDtPakO1k4Fh VTidTDe6PjlIUD////+9YGZ5AAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+UFEQ01Gv2TN4QAAAGlSURB VDjLdZNBb+sgDMed0fWcbNLOT920c/RMOFcCen5S8D0Trb//R3g27RZIO6tExj//bZNQgG4oBl0/ dEMPALrkMWysl8QOYLgC8cTpb6DXjaxeHtBJKflJrFOnk5guFTyV2ppyLSVpr7p/OUANygCvYwE3 xWoDWIkdDn/uQG+S+zr8/XRtXEexc0ZEXrAhOqNjRp9d2JQCMMwcEPOmuYI3jh5Ll2ND2QY6cekx N2CPuJjMi7i2CuMIGSVoji2IRC57vpVZZ94RUToHrymI4w/orQAKgRajWlqbT6oIRGhDpERjVUr3 wkSaKK0vC2Kk+VKA8EoBONEpS5egzag++TPNbxd/jW9AOp1LPEX6VwE5SYglfZZ2fgXmB+h0qZJE iqEEy+THSiF7H1W0ObtsE9jvgmsTNGikso3JUXNETZl0eSfiaip1n0cwclF2Y/VKCtid3BktLs1d 0DJm5gsFxw0wRYbTzF/cXhL9kB4xyL3zWwApO7m/jHdg3Ctx070EsuMAOR7vCZj32/Bb230oHR+A kv0A7JfyLL783x/brwB+BY/tP0rubGCTDWEYAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA1LTE3 VDEzOjUzOjI2KzAwOjAwxDEUAAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNS0xN1QxMzo1Mzoy NiswMDowMLVsrLwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Jay Glass Dubs's _Nyx_: "An Ambivalent Path" In-Reply-To: <83k0nxu062.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 17 May 2021 13:25:41 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206707 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Since we decided not to remove unexec in Emacs 28, we do need to keep > the unexec configuration working. So I find it unfortunate that you > keep saying that, because the result is a direct contradiction of what > we decided. Well, if we decided something at one point, we can decide something else now. The question is whether it makes sense to spend time trying to fix something that's not being used. Keeping unexec around in a broken state isn't very satisfying, and worries about unexec is what's stalling the removal of pure space, too. So at this point I think I'd rather just remove unexec now instead of waiting until Emacs 29. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no