From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Fieber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40397: 28.0.50; epg decrypt does not verify signed content in smime encrypted and signed message Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:07:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87y29zo81c.fsf@web.de> References: <87imih5am2.fsf@web.de> <87r1x4dujl.fsf@web.de> <87lfna22eh.fsf@web.de> <874ktxtr6d.fsf@web.de> <87d08lh0qa.fsf@gmail.com> <87wo6tayhy.fsf@web.de> <85r1x0mv6q.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7xv9k3x.fsf@web.de> <873655oaa5.fsf@gnus.org> <87bljsajvb.fsf@web.de> <87sgd4e011.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsw7ptc1.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39335"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40397@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 21 20:08:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m6Gde-000A1q-Us for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:08:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6Gdc-0002ic-VD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6GdW-0002iT-OP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6GdW-0005Qj-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6GdW-0006TO-7R; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sebastian Fieber Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40397 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 40397-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40397.162689084024829 (code B ref 40397); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40397) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2021 18:07:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6Gcq-0006SO-71 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:58489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6Gco-0006S7-CK for 40397@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:07:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1626890832; bh=Kgaj4ta4ncWjj/dvmStocGbZy2HHQUQbeTq5syXMiqk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=WcUv6iFN1lcPYRQKkzSzkuOFyIt6Re6+TLTH4MBwqfb4ekvYzQ+PgM4GUEwrFYEmD o66XC8q4bUsuYLrgJCSYssy1+kt6rtlvD27449Whx9/q/KwWT4+0eKVJbtweJ2p3G0 7+pK7pINSisMBvIRHQ6NafEdF0VgtJt/gOQ6Rch8= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from comedian ([94.31.96.135]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1McIgY-1lW7Wm0hiu-00chok; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:07:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fsw7ptc1.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:41:50 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PTu6Ve1Eon4/Dtdt0gidjYt/g1kSHZrCTYv5ZkwpYRKVtPnHFKk fe4hUBEd0qN/mlgy+nielh+GqgaMFIBIRbSC11jjEevWzUAKtmaNCzEJ9qfHxToTn8UVl3h b2bLvxinkNFcj/Y6qOB18TvYN5m6/dWr9tz65K+o0DKfj261KRedzSEMpkbJVNoZFDCMmEh l+HcfN2uzT1XtLAYO03Hg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:odqgS4gpewU=:Ydj9DNs2+GZOjGA4067wNX oaX8YDDUQEE32/xPo4a5bjwsyui57E0QSp3AgJk6v3+JC6Jj1Xo006DhM+sHzSW5iUOvSDnyv vVMauSs6UN/qt1QdGWkfPJSb9r28ifObllxFVTCsp5BPK4fZ7ezPqCQ3+5pTTKdki9VJTrkPf WmQko+JEhkY2C+1nZkdgVKK9bmhwoZoy5uPP+mqja7NFvne1gbUGuLwFDrxMzrEyKOmDvGu1/ GSzecz+0yZf1IjnJyPh8mpo8+ADnziEFW1iklMUZ5rsXmoTaoSvbJYIgBDK7Ut00jrfAFs4oP g/IUSjYf05I8FB0GeJgHf31f/b+LHrM0T3YMxVSsv7aTVERIx5niIKxPgHSm7pUNhS3chLnsh 99GCAg9sWX9BYOvKC/1uvp0cnlB7OaVkvs10NIDiXg67e31M0cscJL24Xul7hOOXPqCsE42h1 BWFsWxMnmtbZJ3KVakP2ZA+1wmA+kpgf0eh5Mwi4M/+yXvTsZIJU4EXfUEm29rI90eOCwjQxg QuTNjspnMpRslyIvbVL4eKjqxXP/mcNUs6QCqMvyIhQMJj+cwBGdL4yAKPVPpvtoMP9guLCC5 OxGCsXyPU1E6dTTKvaPfsHN3F6E8K6Wv2Lxc/D0YGUh6FdZ7o5XqfT4NWKQ4PUegknJLVIHTl zKF08Up9uo8gjSJEF/gd/OB2mNYZ3L+RJ8F6t9dNQf+5/YoaPZyxzVwX2nDKh3/sDRqM6gKTG 3QgDKoJLNzRLZTBI0iuOL5OY0QK0OFX9zwxePMbNxptv8xnVGAmzEryNhAFQdRKxrVfrPKzM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210469 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Mi, Jul 21 2021, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >>> So I'd like to work on this a bit more and provide a >>> more fully featured patch. But I'm pretty busy right now with real >>> life, so this may take a few months as I'd need to find some time. >> >> Sure, no hurry. :-) > > This was a year ago -- has there been any progress here? Sorry, haven't got to it yet, but it's still on my TODO list. Also the paper work for the FSF from my employer is still not finished. I will try my best to get some traction at my employer so the paperwork gets done soon and the patch, as it is now, can at least be accepted. I'd still like to work on it, but maybe that would be better as another patch building upon this one? What do you think? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFMBAEBCAA2FiEExRi5b+8xM5Vpvu7L3jJw+EOyhogFAmD4Yk8YHHNlYmFzdGlh bi5maWViZXJAd2ViLmRlAAoJEN4ycPhDsoaILgcIAJTNN/dV8JsrIw9aVEA66JxM CVab7QNBZdTK0We5l7NJbR7Ui2iQqPRAFQ7sqSw21ieVtWbXWAPCaj6TP3ariAPn H04bUOROQHirwL2wLtPc8L50SyDkuqqiljDT4Ga5wmUsWBMxUzKKkFrL/CQ/0N0D fQiLDZXBaecaWHVUUOIc1aM2UjG8fAUSoH/PnEfpHUZ4ZKxDNB2x9BRdEY8cw90T bd5vvhRtJVOkiqZSlDXlvUDQ80mhbC5Et5rGkE10BLVw0SW9N6TlNzqNg9NB73j1 7XDZhDeUVtd9ZI3e85j4t3TsMM0yk53vCAQFwS1w5O9kYLYiBeYy1OaAgQjOBCo= =YIoz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--