From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55039: [PATCH] Use VC-relative file names in ChangeLog entries Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:53:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87y1uu58p8.fsf@posteo.net> References: <8735i7zvk4.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8v3sq0n.fsf@gnu.org> <87czc8u56q.fsf@gnus.org> <871qsooenn.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7vsfu5p.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1uwijzt.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkrsdzzm.fsf@posteo.net> <83mtbafip7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfl26ypw.fsf@posteo.net> <87lequ3w20.fsf@gnus.org> <878rmuxdmg.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkrq3v13.fsf@gnus.org> <8735d26npz.fsf@posteo.net> <87wnae2fz8.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5303"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 55039@debbugs.gnu.org, Visuwesh To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 08 14:59:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH7z-0001Dg-Ds for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:59:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH7y-0007yK-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH2h-0001B9-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH2g-0004nF-Sk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH2g-00012I-OY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo patch Original-Received: via spool by 55039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55039.16626415973890 (code B ref 55039); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2022 12:53:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57585 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH1x-00010f-07 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:36311) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH1v-00010Q-4p for 55039@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35358240104 for <55039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 14:53:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1662641589; bh=QNI2m4FdbxmoMWJ5FokDlP+uFzaOleQKaiZuYs1TE/w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=mF5cYFBnVi/KYzaBS926wg4fWNwiaFva8Yz57TANxpA4QPF1Id1B42j1uusk62IYF KfJTZOtj4taF4RXBEJLNlpUELQWdwVBlRFbF0etjjG2d1KLyqhnUZaegJPKZ5r8Dd9 CxUqPuxf0B0CnLTMxZh4Zq2HkUNBiPL+z+uh+90Yf6cBtLX3z2YWPYVtMVFktOsAD0 fLuRsRLRROgkPzUnOwG+qeycHKGWLNTw+/IMdQ4dSJp6gbPXL3S7eJyRWLl/rRom3C tsvVPL9lf99K9+35G8zaCg/vGu0ZFJ6IEGb1x+LQ5QehjpgH8WLDSBLvIxl4GgF6Rr idQKMbJIHdA6g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MNfDh32xkz6ttF; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 14:53:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87wnae2fz8.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:44:11 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241874 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >>> But is that backwards-compatible? >> ^ typo? > > No? > >> If you meant incompatible, it is any more or less incompatible than >> adding the boundp to the end of the line? > > It was a question -- I wouldn't have asked if I knew what the answer > was. In that case I am confused, if ;; boundp foo-bar: t is backwards-compatible it appears preferable.