From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Jacobson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: how about using the development Emacs? Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 06:40:43 +0800 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87wui81sb8.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> References: <87adfb8j7w.fsf@jidanni.org> <87u1dg77ct.fsf@jidanni.org> Reply-To: Dan Jacobson NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1049591280 2297 80.91.224.249 (6 Apr 2003 01:08:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 06 03:07:59 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 191yda-0000as-00 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 03:07:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 191ycB-0008Rh-04 for gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 20:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 191ybE-0006hH-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 20:05:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 191ybA-0006Xs-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 20:05:30 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 191yb9-0006Fn-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 20:05:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 191yah-0000Rg-00 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 03:04:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 191yag-0000RX-00 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 03:04:58 +0200 Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:4728 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:4728 >>>>> "RMS" == Richard Stallman writes: RMS> What Emacs version is this? It does not fail for me in the latest RMS> development Emacs. notRMS> Gnus puts the version in my headers, Emacs/21.2. RMS> That header is hidden by default in Rmail. Well, it is hidden too here in gnus, but every gnus produced message has it in the header, so if I were you, I'd tell rmail not to hide that header for you, and even instead, highlight it, blink it :-), as it seems like a good thing to know for you. I.e. unless the user mentions differently, the one in the header is what he's using. I mean all these bytes added to each message over the years and the Chief GNUisance is not benefiting from them?! RMS> Anyway, how about using the development Emacs? Then you'd report new RMS> bugs rather than the old bugs. What fun would that be then? Seriously though, you overestimate my bandwidth, 56K, with another coin dropping every 10 minutes, and even if I wanted to blow the dough, they said my mountaintop hideaway is too far for ADSL etc. Plus, with my new multifaceted life, I don't even use the computer every day. And, with my Limited Edition Brain, I leave the setting up to Debian Sid, which I freshen with CDs maybe once a year on some rare trip to town. Anyway, it seems 4 out of 5 of my bugs are still there anyway, not bad. -- http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780