From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9014: emacs -q -nw vs. no -nw Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:12:58 -0400 Message-ID: <87wrfu2ho5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4E156388.7070703@swipnet.se> <877h7u5y92.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310062048 31355 80.91.229.12 (7 Jul 2011 18:07:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9014@debbugs.gnu.org To: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 20:07:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qesyt-0008J7-LI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:07:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54849 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qesyq-0004wq-5l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QerDM-0006gs-GH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QerDH-0000Ze-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QerDG-0000ZQ-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QerDG-0001HV-0p; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9014 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 9014-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9014.13100551884843 (code B ref 9014); Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9014) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2011 16:13:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QerCN-0001G4-Vj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QerCL-0001Fb-Id for 9014@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036225109.central.yale.edu [128.36.225.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p67GCxKB016197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:12:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877h7u5y92.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:46:33 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:14:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48177 Archived-At: In the future, please describe the precise symptoms of the bug. This is far from a satisfactory report: > Gentlemen, does > $ emacs -q A > $ emacs -q -nw A > give the same for you?