From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2151: 23.0.90; Building the 23.0.90 pretest recompiles Lisp files Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:50:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87wrdekate.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <83hc04d4ls.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315777918 20949 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 21:51:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2151@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 23:51:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2rwN-00083v-GH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 23:51:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47708 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2rwM-0003zQ-DL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2rwK-0003zA-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2rwG-0005Vu-Qj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2rwG-0005Vq-O1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2s0Q-0005xD-4G; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2151 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2151-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2151.131577811422835 (code B ref 2151); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2151) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 21:55:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2rze-0005wF-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2rzc-0005w9-Eu for 2151@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8BLorCQ023798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:50:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 23:12:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:56:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51008 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> This bug is still present when building 23.0.93 on GNU/Linux. > > Is this bug still relevant? I mean, these days probably most people > builds from bzr and not the tarballs... I don't know if that is true, and anyway the actual releases are distributed as tarballs. So yes, this is still relevent.