From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen Berman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working Date: 7 Feb 2012 22:22:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87wr7yl4os.fsf@escher.home> References: <87fwemnbft.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328649796 31267 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 21:23:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10751@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Glenn Morris" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 22:23:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RusVK-0004Tc-9R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:23:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35329 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusVJ-0003IG-OI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusVH-0003I6-55 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusVE-0007Ix-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:23:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusVE-0007It-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RusW9-0000lW-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:24:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Stephen Berman" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10751 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 10751-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10751.13286497932872 (code B ref 10751); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2012 21:23:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RusVM-0000kH-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:23:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mi.ruhr-uni-bochum.de ([134.147.64.30]:38578 helo=mx6.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RusVK-0000k9-Ps for 10751@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:23:12 -0500 X-Queued: (qmail 3034 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2012 21:22:12 -0000 X-Queued: (qmail 3007 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2012 21:22:12 -0000 Original-Received: from c2-3-4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (134.147.64.5) by mx6.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 7 Feb 2012 21:22:12 -0000 X-Queued: (qmail 31313 invoked by uid 281); 7 Feb 2012 21:22:12 -0000 X-Qmailscanner: from 89.245.179.78 (Pj9yBs7kPuSGuNNpo5oHRA==@89.245.179.78) by c2-3-4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (envelope-from , uid 80) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (sophie: 3.05/3.25/4.71. Clear:RC:1(89.245.179.78):. Processed in 0.021821 secs); 07 Feb 2012 21:22:12 -0000 Original-Received: from i59f5b34e.versanet.de (HELO escher.home) (Pj9yBs7kPuSGuNNpo5oHRA==@89.245.179.78) by c2-3-4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 7 Feb 2012 21:22:11 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:02:05 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56674 Archived-At: On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:02:05 -0500 Glenn Morris wrote: > "Stephen Berman" wrote: > >> => My mailbox received two copies of the email, both sent to the address >> in the To: header line. > >> In both there is no Bcc: header line > > That's the nature of BCC, no? Not with an email I sent from Gnus last July; this is how it looks (aside from the anonymization) in the Gnus Article buffer: From: Stephen Berman Subject: Bla bla To: Stephen.Berman@gmx.net Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:32:57 +0200 (29 weeks, 11 hours, 33 minutes ago) Bcc: xxxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxxxxxx.xxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxx.xxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxx.xxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx Is this wrong? In any case, this mail did arrive at the addresses in both the To: and the Bcc: header lines. >>, and there was no email sent to the address in the Bcc: header line. > > Works for me. > > I don't supposed your bcc address somehow redirects to the To address? > That would explain why you get two copies. No, I used addresses that do not have anything to do with each other. Steve Berman