From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Teemu Likonen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10779: 24.0.93; ERC: Patch to make server response timestamp format customizable Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:00:43 +0300 Message-ID: <87wr4xrhqs.fsf@mithlond.arda> References: <87pqdmzsmk.fsf@mithlond.arda> <87r4vsfibi.fsf@mithlond.arda> <874ns2pe58.fsf@mithlond.arda> <4F9DB4E5.8030705@dogan.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335758519 11731 80.91.229.3 (30 Apr 2012 04:01:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10779@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Deniz Dogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 30 06:01:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SOhoB-0001bb-FX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:01:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOhoA-0002G5-RP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:01:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOho7-0002G0-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:01:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOho6-000066-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:01:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.43] (port=57305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOho5-00005u-U5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOhpG-0001u6-Hp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Teemu Likonen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10779 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 10779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10779.13357585287256 (code B ref 10779); Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2012 04:02:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOhoN-0001sz-Rs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:49673 helo=jenni2.inet.fi) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOhoL-0001sr-Gy for 10779@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mithlond.arda (84.251.132.215) by jenni2.inet.fi (8.5.140.02) id 4F9DEAE20000A922; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:00:44 +0300 Original-Received: from dtw by mithlond.arda with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOhn1-0000eJ-G1; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:00:43 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4F9DB4E5.8030705@dogan.se> (Deniz Dogan's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:38:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59641 Archived-At: * Deniz Dogan [2012-04-29 23:38:45 +0200] wrote: > Have you received a confirmation from FSF? Yes.