From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16103: 24.3.50; `read' and circular objects Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 01:32:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87wqjcw7kz.fsf@web.de> References: <87txegjpc0.fsf@igel.home> <94011d65-db0e-46b6-b426-86450dffff66@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386721994 11750 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2013 00:33:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16103-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 11 01:33:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXjp-00086Z-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 01:33:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51934 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXjp-0001cL-27 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42859) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXjf-0001c1-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:33:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXja-0008Nh-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXja-0008Nd-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXja-0000bq-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16103 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16103-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D16103.13867219602310 (code D ref 16103); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16103-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2013 00:32:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42487 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXjD-0000bB-03 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:32:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:53164) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqXjA-0000b2-B5 for 16103-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:32:37 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.152.56]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LnjNH-1VLsOm3U59-00hzCy for <16103-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 01:32:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <94011d65-db0e-46b6-b426-86450dffff66@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:04:57 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:isUUBjEqek4jRgk2m4YJNReZunuJHhXCx7eMc0uJvgyf8Xm88Cf v1qYKKnjuusYucvzn2rVpn31nw17U94Z+5qN8FSmYzlVEOuI/Wp2ZdszV5PgB4LRsRJuroN dWww8b2RmW8WQ8RGcmvxgCNzzH9PXjhlc0EZPbe3MmTjahaz+R6yIf9Avh745erR0cMCjkU fVSft6fb6UXAZl5rcWdJQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81731 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > > You didn't set print-circle. > > Sorry, I don't understand. Why do you say that? I guess he meant the second action, when you did (read (current-buffer)) Did you have print-circle t there, too, when the result of `read' was printed? Regards, Michael.