From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: oscarfv@telefonica.net (=?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18699: 25.0.50; Windows 7: Odd length text property list Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:39:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87wq83iwsq.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87eguclr91.fsf@telefonica.net> <87a950lob5.fsf_-_@wanadoo.es> <8338as8ri7.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq847az4.fsf@gnu.org> <8761fojiml.fsf@telefonica.net> <83k3446som.fsf@gnu.org> <871tqcjcn6.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83iojn7pqt.fsf@gnu.org> <543C24AD.7090101@cornell.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413229227 6171 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2014 19:40:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18699@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 13 21:40:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlTe-0005KF-K3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:40:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35180 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlTe-00079o-76 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:40:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlTV-00079f-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlTO-0004Q8-Pg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlTO-0004Q3-Ms for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlTN-0003Ux-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: oscarfv@telefonica.net (=?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18699 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18699-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18699.141322918213412 (code B ref 18699); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18699) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2014 19:39:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42876 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlT3-0003UF-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: from relaycp01.dominioabsoluto.net ([217.116.26.68]:36582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XdlSz-0003U1-0k for 18699@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:39:39 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.movistar.es (smtp22.acens.net [86.109.99.146]) by relaycp01.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B10D44A8; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:12:49 +0200 (CEST) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0207.543C2A76.0344, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Original-Received: from qcore (79.158.173.198) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 543BDF950002128F; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:39:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <543C24AD.7090101@cornell.edu> (Ken Brown's message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:14:53 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94466 Ken Brown writes: > Right. And it's *not* about the processor. gcc running under 32-bit > Cygwin will not define __x86_64__, regardless of the processor. It is about the *target* processor of the compiler. Obviously if you target x86 then __x86_64__ is expected to be undefined, regardless of the *host* processor. OTOH if you are saying that Cygwin does not define __x86_64__ when you are cross-compiling to a x86_64 target on a x86 host, I'll consider that a bug. My understanding now is that the __x86_64__ test is there because Cygwin does not define _WIN64. Eli, both MinGW and MinGW-w64 compilers support sjlj and Dwarf exception methods on x86. Maybe MinGW only supports one method on its official binaries, but that's just a detail that can change at any moment. Plus the user can build his own toolchain. And since when we do care about C++ here? ;-)