bug#20897: 25.0.50; [python] sexp-movement are confusing

[Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>]

Hi,

Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> writes:

>> Sexp movement in python.el are very confusing to me.  I know that logical
>> sexp movements outside lisp are subjective,
>
> Not more as anything else editor-related. Languages are composed by
> elements, which a syntax may describe. Even if an editor must not be
> the slave of a syntax, it should be aware of.

That is probably true.  I really just want to be able to bent python.el to
work with my internal "fast" logic which controls how I type on keyboard.

>>   and I know that the behavior
>> isn't wrong.
>
> It behaves arbitrary WRT Python syntax, that's wrong.

OK.  I'm not sure.  I can somehow imagine parentheses that would justify
the movements cf. below.  But in lisp it would not go from one "nesting"
to another, which is essentially what bugs me.


> Python is composed by expressions.
> If inside an expression C-M-f should to to its end.
>
> From end to next end same level if existing - or level up, or next
> top-level-form, or nil at EOB
>
> Backward and forward needs to be consistent.

I'm not sure I understand.

The way I think about it is like the following.  If I'm at point 2 and
move backward I really want to be a point 1.  But in python point 0 and 1
is the same, so it assumes the outer level which has end point 4.  But I
at most want to go to point 3, closing the "nearest" "sexp".

01     2          3
vv     v          V
((defun name (arg))
 ...)
     ^ 
     4

Rasmus

-- 
Don't panic!!!