From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=BCnster?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:10:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87wppspsnh.fsf@roche-blanche.net> References: <8738bkdjqg.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <878u2eun9o.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <834md2niqt.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2lyszy2.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83bn79n66p.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb5hry9y.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83r3g4lnor.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3g4o4uw.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83h9h0jwfo.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvqru119.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <8360xfjsyr.fsf@gnu.org> <878u2bs7tl.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83r3g3iajr.fsf@gnu.org> <87twkypfqx.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83vb5egg8y.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuwikmzc.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83io1ege6r.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4a9kh9e.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <87vb5dvf6c.fsf@gnus.org> <8760xdi54j.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83vb5cg4r6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456423943 16417 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2016 18:12:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 18522@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 19:12:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0Oa-0002qD-A4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:12:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45099 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0OZ-0001yY-Hi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:12:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0OU-0001yD-T9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0OQ-00027Z-Ru for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0OQ-00027V-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0OQ-0007s2-BI; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8738bkdjqg.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> Resent-From: Peter =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=BCnster?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18522 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18522-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18522.145642387530200 (code B ref 18522); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18522) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2016 18:11:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0Nf-0007r2-Bh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:11:15 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.127]:24877 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ0Nd-0007qp-N9 for 18522@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:11:14 -0500 Original-Received: from micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org ([2.14.65.45]) by mwinf5d28 with ME id NiAy1s00X0yazV603iAykZ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:11:06 +0100 X-ME-Helo: micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org X-ME-Auth: ZHJwbUB3YW5hZG9vLmZy X-ME-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:11:06 +0100 X-ME-IP: 2.14.65.45 Original-Received: by micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 82555F4CA; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:10:58 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113817 Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 25 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > . gnus-buffers references killed buffers because Peter kills buffers > behind Gnus back, instead of letting them be killed through > gnus-kill-buffer, which would have removed them from gnus-buffers This point is perhaps not 100% accurate. After 6h running, here some more details about the situation: - length of all_buffers: 74 - length of buffer-list: 45 - length of killed-buffer-names: 28 - length of gnus-buffers: 17 Content of killed-buffer-names: Name Details ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- " *mm*" ??? " *mm*-292588" ??? " *mm*-331546" ??? " *mm*-391449" ??? " *mm*-531130" ??? " *mm*-59524" ??? " *mm*-705438" ??? " *mm*-971636" ??? " *nnmail message-id cache*" ??? " *nnml overview inbox*" ??? " *server news.gmane.org nntp *nntpd**" ??? " *server news.gmane.org nntp *nntpd**" ??? " *server news.povray.org nntp *nntpd**" ??? " *server news.povray.org nntp *nntpd**" ??? "*Backtrace*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*Completions*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*Completions*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*Help*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*Summary nndraft:drafts*" killed by gnus-summary-exit "*Summary nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.comp. embedded.openwrt.user*" killed by gnus-summary-exit "*sent mail to SAV*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*sent mail to XXX*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*sent mail to YYY*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*unsent wide reply to Eli Zaretskii*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*unsent wide reply to SAV*" killed by me with kill-buffer "*unsent wide reply to ZZZ*" killed by me with kill-buffer "gnus-util.el" killed by me with kill-buffer "jl-encrypt.el" killed by me with kill-buffer There are 6 "#" in gnus-buffers. That means, that I should have killed the 6 buffers "*sent ..." and "*unsent ..." with gnus-kill-buffer. I'll do that in the future. But what about the other buffers? -- Peter