From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23124: Two minibuffer resize related bugs Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:25:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpoabkuf.fsf@gmx.net> References: <56F7FD74.6080802@gmx.at> <831t6vzv9b.fsf@gnu.org> <56F847EC.9010303@gmx.at> <87lh53k4pr.fsf@gmx.net> <56F9140C.9050709@gmx.at> <87io06u67w.fsf@gmx.net> <56FA9B84.40708@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459970799 3260 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2016 19:26:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23124@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 21:26:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5i-0005FY-0w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:26:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5h-0003KF-AV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5a-0003K5-HM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5W-0003Sz-Iu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5W-0003Sv-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5W-0000GG-Aw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23124 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23124-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23124.1459970753989 (code B ref 23124); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2016 19:25:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5N-0000Ft-DM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:54874) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ant5M-0000FZ-EX for 23124@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([89.245.123.53]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOCSm-1arD011ilA-005Wps; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:25:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <56FA9B84.40708@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:13:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:27Ra+hbpc3Lgm+QI28DH8Fbbw35nPAWQim9DAf3VL8xKyC9jwSu C7jGy5qLYAovo1dyZ7c/P1/FgehP2FU/KQz9qqIMfBcS34mB0Y0FZJZPzS0oQUMI9X5LHkV /jslew4CwoZBojLKEy5pHp/r7wicdZ66yIqqhulHs1DiNip9JHOqz5frcMfdd3XyEw26Cdi gKkwsmoHElu2NLGWKo6FQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Ts3Cj4jzZb0=:wThQwM/Luvco3Tdf0fdCbW Lg6SaCQr+TRayMx1UaFkh2D5EcqbMqZkNpO4sLeXnwo2nVdSZ06Vd3Ldju4AlXjha9K9NNMhw 9NzfnZ2f80Qv+VNnQknYNSpRom51a/QXrzOvO/KxlLC4tToRPN2NFYIN74vkXoQ/4U2wFbn2P nWHOrh2Uxmzci038rsd8qRFcPytdDuN0f5TUNH2Xcg/7qg/itVyZXrVX1681/M/C9/5AF9wSp dHzaQJ2LZG2K2xwqj5T46gKS4GK6oMlDun+AxzVpepoFBlrxMlS4btK15yjGWbPiJnV1HstYf 02G/q3l00iMJHBFel4UMoRRnUlvvBWfQjcrQyOdU3ePhemmTABg0Bt99DMwIgoENRDjWnIYjq 5QMSk5nLILKa5QFU+PrniiZ5Fl/Si4XaQC5POl7IN1pbgWp4HlxMn64uRyTrmAWsfohL0HDbN jXHgmLGgUanqdZWRHq/rQjqYgbUQFeBE3aqXE3n8MZJ2OyFvd3QvL4SFQuMO1KfcLu6Z7tmb2 VXVTA/THWvhAaO01W+nhrlrGORINrUK0ewkRfokm+68Iob4eNtiPWxypGqwlN+7xHk5031UFT kuaLshlMFBCdNNJOnHN2Tc9ZGIWn4q03XOcDINODz6FdIeztDo9RE0gd0hi9mdUwFfenGe+ge xNFLUTdNjARhlo0G+3zoviZxyj8ob3gdxe0Zk7N4GLSDJG8+166AIBh5Q/NqpNtl+Bg0GdXAL EgRBQWs1XvqqXEc51bhXeXsSOUv0ZWb+PYzLxZAU2sPt2LfJSBnvzNeDi+BWIYpHpQ6Qvxts X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116134 Archived-At: On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:13:08 +0200 martin rudalics wrote: >>> I have no idea why C-x 5 2 should resize the echo area in the first >>> place. Are you sure this happened with Eli's scenario above? >> >> Yes; I verified it before sending my post yesterday, and again just now. > > I cannot reproduce the problem here. Can you get a backtrace from where > grow_mini_window is called? > >> It does, however, appear to be the case that only the first `C-x 5 2' >> has this effect: typing that key sequence from either the second frame >> (with the wide echo area/minibuffer) or from the first frame (with the >> normal echo area/minibuffer) creates a frame with a normal echo area/ >> minibuffer. > > Can you try bisecting when this started to appear? On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:38:59 +0200 martin rudalics wrote: >> Is there something else to do wrt this bug report? > > I don't think so. If Steve's bug is not fixed now, a separate report > seems due anyway. Sorry for the long delay in replying; I was away for a week and only saw your followup mail and Eli's proposed fix last night and could not attend to it till now. I was hopeful that it also fixes the resizing I observed, but I just built from the latest emacs-25 sources, which include that fix, tried the recipe and the resizing happened again. However, I now find that I cannot reliably reproduce it: on repeating the recipe several times the resizing happened one or two more times but then no more. I also tried all previous builds I have, going back to emacs-25.0.90, and in most cases did not get the resizing, but it did happen a few times, but again not reproducibly (including the build I was using when I initially posted my observation to this thread). So I guess it's no use trying to bisect or debug the problem, or filing a separate bug report for it. Too bad. > And if your "C-x 5 2" scenario is not already covered > anywhere else, you probably should file a separate report as well. With Eli's fix I still observe "C-x 5 2" in the new frame's echo area, irrespective of whether the resizing happens or not. Steve Berman