From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10872: bug#10875: 24.0.93; `where-is-internal' and command remapping Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:46:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpnhkfrx.fsf@gnus.org> References: <500CA4A40EBF4D9E8A9C18A4AD5F0737@us.oracle.com> <03BF7C8FBF2747F0BE37715153E239BF@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461851243 10921 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2016 13:47:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10872@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Chong Yidong' , 10875@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 15:47:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avmHe-0008Li-VD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:47:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49287 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avmHe-0003RZ-35 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avmHa-0003Pj-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avmHV-00050l-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avmHV-00050h-MV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avmHV-000656-I2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10872 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10872-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10872.146185117721323 (code B ref 10872); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10872) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2016 13:46:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avmGn-0005Xb-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:39507) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avmGl-0005Vr-Vh; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:46:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avmGh-00058L-KU; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:46:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <03BF7C8FBF2747F0BE37715153E239BF@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 21 Jul 2012 14:59:16 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117058 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > No one has ever responded to this bug. It was merged with 10872 for some > reason, and that bug was supposedly fixed. > > But that was a DOC bug and this is a product BEHAVIOR bug. I do not see > anything fixed for this bug: `where-is-internal' still returns the wrong result. This is what Chong added: The optional 5th arg NO-REMAP alters how command remapping is handled: - If another command OTHER-COMMAND is remapped to DEFINITION, normally search for the bindings of OTHER-COMMAND and include them in the returned list. But if NO-REMAP is non-nil, include the vector [remap OTHER-COMMAND] in the returned list instead, without searching for those other bindings. - If DEFINITION is remapped to OTHER-COMMAND, normally return the bindings for OTHER-COMMAND. But if NO-REMAP is non-nil, return the bindings for DEFINITION instead, ignoring its remapping. */) I'm not sure I understand what you're saying about `where-is-internal'. Do you have a test case that displays that it's doing something other then what is documented? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no