On 2017-02-13, at 20:00, John Wiegley wrote: >>>>>> Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> I'd rather interpret John as being entirely serious. :) Tests are good. > > Dmitry is quite right; any patch that comes with a battery of new tests is > already a huge plus in my book. Thanks - as I said, I was a bit unsure;-). Here's my proposed contribution, formatted as two patches. The first one introduces the testing machinery; the second one introduces mark-defun and its tests. WDYT? -- Marcin Borkowski