From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30207: 27.0.50; [PATCH] other-window-for-scrolling returns window on daemon frame Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:06:21 +0000 Message-ID: <87wp09e642.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <87inbtvqci.fsf@tcd.ie> <5A6634A3.3040403@gmx.at> <87h8rdfnew.fsf@tcd.ie> <87h8rdo1t3.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516669538 28739 195.159.176.226 (23 Jan 2018 01:05:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:05:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 30207@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 02:05:33 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edn1S-0005wC-6T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:05:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51558 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edn3S-00086t-Gt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:07:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edn3L-00086O-Sm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edn3F-0000LJ-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edn3F-0000LE-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:07:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edn3F-0005ek-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:07:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30207 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 30207-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30207.151666959721709 (code B ref 30207); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2018 01:06:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edn2r-0005e5-Em for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:06:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:37809) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edn2q-0005dr-3R for 30207@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:06:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v71so20383795wmv.2 for <30207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=0EZwKyDEA1fqpPjyfXc3iniMalLfSoKMp9OJglHV1ws=; b=lG2UJrmlTrcWlR1Z5ArcsxlSzzWjgZj/q520m8EvDmuz3Cv5wey9zSjjwqStgTda9i Teb23GHjaRrM00iycSesgHFJRJ4zhPAaK5IleLrFiCcB5y8YyRlUtVEEZQwKs/Ya33xY g7zVtAUlFOs4Bt0aPmG8t2uu1vHV+gtlk4arilTmbDFbYkTfeQX+ytICVSLirj14M8FA 3jdHqiU4I84rcQzZhhDqOsBV3/2lzVxIJSyz3552Rv4X3KDj7CI0lao12tvShwZtABUg /R7y8Fk0rEmjkb5igj6bqXG7ZbOuSa6DMW7FEpuz9huMU/Yf41pVbi6Er2MDm8tnY0eL 5gGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=0EZwKyDEA1fqpPjyfXc3iniMalLfSoKMp9OJglHV1ws=; b=SdxLDDO3XJvikOguTcVhTGHNS4Wju9tDi1TLtvMp+AuN2uSD4CBi2qmJC1giFVIt7y ERDWK7frmhxL1iZKJEKkxBdTxkVSzHMjiHFyuPXCG4CAbzlih2nW62adyZzcfb8TKeBT 3Q+g76/sEAqaXbUtkD1LoGgTVj9Hqb/OgzV+LzNlT+U0a8gayYWJnJkEk8tNxK8YEpCJ O/EHhJ63vieuNGD6sDs3hi/ZIxAs46zngQWq+hqnnp63XAcnJXhRuQ6IGvIZCAHzxb5k ArnxpruVVHBjtzHHqF3yGBlnpo/cV7/5EOpTjG119XP4tutXo9bT/Swl8uu3pSjbPRcq g/DQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytekS2Sx9AJoNqlTHO3gYiwc1FLy2YqgmYcVRfICGaDHnnhzSgnN evpUUpFZnB39CFfYcQgigyJLOw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226viMsxZRIUQEq239r12WL7k2VAu8gjlnYHjnmvphCj02SdZ7u5GoZEPkAqSX9Fr6IqXsul+g== X-Received: by 10.80.244.226 with SMTP id v31mr16399699edm.221.1516669590445; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:4f41:8c80:9929:5bdb:4629:fab8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm11943763edb.85.2018.01.22.17.06.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87h8rdo1t3.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:29:12 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142413 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: > I believe some people use Emacs in a single-window-per-frame style and > manage the frames via the window manager, so scrolling in other > terminals sounds useful for that kind of scenario. I am one such user, but all frames managed by my window manager live in the same terminal and I would be surprised if this weren't the case in most setups. Nevertheless, I suppose it is conceivable that someone may have such an unusual setup one day... > I'm still of the opinion that the daemon frame should be marked > invisible (what with it being not visible and all). I'm only beginning to look into the relevant code, but this seems intuitively right to me too. -- Basil