Alan Third writes: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:47:29AM -0500, Noam Postavsky wrote: >> Philipp Stephani writes: >> >> > The differing element is the last access time. This isn't surprising >> > given that reading the directory accesses it. Probably the test >> > should simply ignore the fifth element (the access time).  >> >> Ah, good point. I went through all the different file handlers pretty >> quickly when writing these tests, so I missed these details. It passes >> for me because I mount with 'relatime'. >> >> Element 9 is "unspecified", so I think we shouldn't check that either. > > The patch makes it even worse with two failures now: Sorry about that, I made some initial fix, then after testing, extended it, but completely forgot to actually try out the extended version. Here's a patch actually works on my box (and hopefully on others too).