From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31634: emacs 26.1 Compilation error and fix on Solaris 10 Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 14:55:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87wovmfwow.fsf@gmail.com> References: <000301d3f710$d7fc4d10$87f4e730$@orange.fr> <87k1rn3qi3.fsf@igel.home> <000b01d3f71c$2a2d4070$7e87c150$@orange.fr> <87fu2b3oya.fsf@igel.home> <871sduhjzu.fsf@gmail.com> <001501d3f73d$950fe930$bf2fbb90$@orange.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527598450 25265 195.159.176.226 (29 May 2018 12:54:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31634@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Andreas Schwab' To: "Christian Jullien" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 29 14:54:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNe8a-0006R4-Pb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 14:54:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32863 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNeAi-0003AV-1M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:56:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNeAZ-00039e-7V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNeAU-0003az-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNeAU-0003am-9R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNeAT-00049X-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:56:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31634 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31634-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31634.152759853815925 (code B ref 31634); Tue, 29 May 2018 12:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31634) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2018 12:55:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53269 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNeA5-00048m-Pg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:55:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:39184) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNeA4-00048Y-9S for 31634@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:55:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f8-v6so40376050wmc.4 for <31634@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 05:55:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=MpMtsLw9et6Ga5ZCuFugShCWDkPm2kMormhq6ofNzYA=; b=f/jmTg3ep7gSqCIAbCgub37EaPkVO3ilk6VlZ2mACWHr0L5URWcCKUEWCqkWboOnPu /mnNdY5fZQc8JMjkm/DaVfjIlCR6BkA8OOiBEAZ07/z1SIK4T5It3wahitwMKQ8t7Oph fwhPEzsIgi0hUeglqu1hoHpMRAAxuhkl3lB8Up0AWf59GocD0lZTKrZltUjLMHLi/nBk GHWgUg7yipoiHwY0aTPmQlxvUqfLPRW3UY053CIjhNW6Q0gRAhXpmeJvdpwyLxJ2s8de ovTB9i7IzfTCpCaJuaqLj4ALW5NmctltPsyCSxF2IE6FpM8ZVFRI9gjMR4B8lNx4bwWd rYHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=MpMtsLw9et6Ga5ZCuFugShCWDkPm2kMormhq6ofNzYA=; b=clu4f+3FIFfbgM/dxzCv41l5Lp1ArVNzZBo2b3IgzP0R4had4/+q9fHrQEOIICTJAg ZZVVhMxqtW0xe2Yj7ol5JjzouYoaiT7gC8a9l0zX2Qlhvkusecum0nBr9EMzfMD6y/vE Wv6L6IHaQ/D4iaSevHnERvsZwhFmpsBYQX4ImrP16zoDMfLaxU8wOiJJ7aIs+sBN3opK 6zWh5OCBSJiHL+JAvjhkXAX5LfT4Gq19JXllv+13Leo8EkdkJLebVaJBna3++xdTgD9S +8drXrG14JhZvMEED/mvgejRDkuof2MEXyDeAdOx1I58UFa7NXG4fBGc/fackA/esQJl vFkw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwf5zwUTd7lCmIA+6Zxz38Nj/cu2ULHNG8/z8Sl9jUqkrL2Sdn7+ RORIuuMhz1buYOUWj4RQyDAPATAWglY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKHjw2U2O5UbeALBQvHpyROYK06vaH9JwQKRP6ti2w94QbinD26Q6ctAvKw/KqrKBSAzZI9JQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9f0f:: with SMTP id i15-v6mr12482071wme.143.1527598529051; Tue, 29 May 2018 05:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b16-v6sm31218909wrm.89.2018.05.29.05.55.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 May 2018 05:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <001501d3f73d$950fe930$bf2fbb90$@orange.fr> (Christian Jullien's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 13:09:57 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146693 Archived-At: "Christian Jullien" writes: > Thanks, this patch works and you can close the bug report. > OK. Eli, for master I presume? > I'm facing other issues like: > ld.so.1: temacs: fatal: libxml2.so.2: version 'SUNW_1.1' not found (required > by file temacs) > That sounds like ld is finding a different library version from the headers used to compile emacs. That shouldn't happen, so it might be another configure bug. Regards Robert