From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Baxter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34639: 26.1; Custom themes break terminal when switching to org-mode Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:19:11 +0000 Message-ID: <87wolmlp34.fsf@yandex.com> References: <877edpnks4.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83lg25nizp.fsf@gnu.org> <874l8t10t3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83a7ilngql.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3x0zfz.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <835zt9ng24.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvgtget3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834l8tnf4b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o971hskf.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8336odnen2.fsf@gnu.org> <87va19dkaw.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <831s3wo87r.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3vofu9.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87imx71vuc.fsf@tcd.ie> <83h8crmdan.fsf@gnu.org> <4780FCD2-DC65-412B-AC86-11F9FF2C4396@gnu.org> <875zt7m5dk.fsf@yandex.com> <87tvgqrfgh.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="219690"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: , kisik21@fireburn.ru, rms@gnu.org, 34639@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 13:20:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gybic-000uzk-1n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:20:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54048 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gybia-0006bi-T1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gybiP-0006bc-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gybiN-0005kF-9x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:20:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gybiM-0005k3-Nq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gybiM-0006RS-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Colin Baxter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34639.155118356724715 (code B ref 34639); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2019 12:19:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gybhm-0006QZ-Oa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:19:27 -0500 Original-Received: from forward106o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.187]:36517) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gybhg-0006QH-IF for 34639@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:19:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mxback20o.mail.yandex.net (mxback20o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::71]) by forward106o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DE0F95061E1F; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:19:13 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp4p.mail.yandex.net (smtp4p.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1402::15:6]) by mxback20o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id YsDMbMi3D5-JD9CIhYc; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:19:13 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1551183553; bh=KtmL35YicfWPh3aC0RgsidH1bg053KSEbGsmgJ6iBLg=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Cc:Cc:Date:References:Message-ID; b=MhgvHJF55Ot049Sr/EOXgMHihy7GPQF9e+txWXUu+jUlS/+G5PWJk7G/9zSs0cgwl 3mmefPix/Ou0gDQsEcoX8PBZjs1pQnEwnojvA/e/coEQG7UVq61neaEsS3QloSn1te l96rl29afYtW9eMKyGpPPIyXY+joQeiVRCdwU04I= Authentication-Results: mxback20o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Original-Received: by smtp4p.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id eMPI4568za-JBDut4g1; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:19:12 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Face: -P+89ASh_wrs;AUGm`!l[}/o-lyK}5W.gq\fkJ{#d6Gu,hWrZNz::iMm5PJb} __A96]-LUrl)X=uF=V|\3-\9/sXvBs/H In-Reply-To: <87tvgqrfgh.fsf@tcd.ie> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:50:38 +0000") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACwAAAAMCAIAAACWSshgAAAABmJLR0QA/wD/AP+gvaeTAAAA sklEQVQ4je1TwY0CQQyzM9kVohQK4EURVwd1Xg2UgpAgMR++55F2JV7nt+NYjsOf6xkU/sbtV4+7 I3gcjjxd6BhiZgaHI3G8rMYEHFzWdB5KmWtwhCFFKMb2JCKY67Am2q3/GrJLRBuG1NL2JCR2Wf1S dmtycu3xAEhdbl6tFEBMl+xxQT8uIJdlUkwGIrabYDAn3/FfzA+hlNUKf7Pe1Uw1vIluZFervMye VgJSPW0SwBtzLmwBGfcsdwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155804 Archived-At: Dear Basil, >>>>> Basil L Contovounesios writes: > Colin Baxter writes: >>>>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > On February 26, 2019 6:55:32 AM GMT+02:00, Glenn Morris >> > wrote: >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> >> >> > I left linum-mode not obsolete because some people might >> decide >> not to > switch due to those differences. We should >> revisit this >> issue a few > years from now, IMO. >> >> >> >> We already agreed to obsolete linum (which has two >> replacements) >> years ago; https://debbugs.gnu.org/27622#37 >> >> > It's not in obsolete, is it? >> >> May I put in a selfish plea to delay obsoleting 'linum-mode'. I >> use it all the time. It's customised to my liking and I much >> prefer it to 'display-line-numbers-mode'. Perhaps, if I use >> 'linum-mode' extensively then there may well be (many?) others >> who do likewise. > Have you tried nlinum-mode in GNU ELPA? It claims to be similar > to linum-mode but implemented more efficiently. I have tried nlinum-mode but didn't like it. I prefer 'linum-ex' for very long files and it works well with linum-mode. But thank you for the suggestion. Best wishes, Colin Baxter m43cap@yandex.com