From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36565: [PATCH] Suppress interactive-only warnings in undo-tests.el Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:09:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87wogq5bw8.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="214902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36565@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 10 14:10:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBQI-000tny-Su for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:10:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBQH-0008Dv-Ui for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:10:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBQB-0008DY-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBQA-0001NB-A1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBQA-0001N1-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBQ9-0001MW-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36565 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36565-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36565.15627605905211 (code B ref 36565); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36565) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2019 12:09:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBPx-0001Ly-LR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:09:49 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:36512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBPv-0001Lq-VZ for 36565@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:09:48 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlBPr-0008U2-W5; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:09:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:14:37 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162619 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > This patch fixes these warnings in make check: > > ELC src/undo-tests.elc > > In toplevel form: > src/undo-tests.el:262:6:Warning: `delete-forward-char' is for interactive use > only; use `delete-char' instead. Hm... is it worth it to suppress warnings in the tests, though? I think we kinda expect there to be a lot of noise when running the tests? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no