From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19822: url-retrieve: allow to fail when no document is associated with the URI Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 09:30:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87wodqgs0z.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87o8z2l4hs.fsf@gnus.org> <835zladzbx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="225870"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 19822@debbugs.gnu.org, ivan@siamics.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 30 09:31:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq9c-000wau-OP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 09:31:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq9b-00052G-3o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq9A-000509-D5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq99-00014q-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq98-00014g-RK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq98-0002GK-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19822 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 19822-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19822.15698286548193 (code B ref 19822); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19822) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2019 07:30:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56748 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq8y-00026Z-V1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:46178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq8w-000247-W2 for 19822@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEq8i-0004eI-KZ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 09:30:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <835zladzbx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:21:06 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167836 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not sure I understand the proposal: we are being asked to remove > ftp:, news:, etc. from being supported by the URL library? I think > those protocols are still widely used, no? Not ftp:, but news: and gopher: and the other obscure ones. They aren't used a lot and some of them do not work at all currently. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no