From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38195: 27.0.50; `edebug-remove-instrumentation' doesn't work for adviced functions Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:11:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87woc1wd86.fsf@web.de> References: <87mucz98y9.fsf@web.de> <87r22brq3b.fsf@gnus.org> <87r22ajh22.fsf@web.de> <87pnhtlg6f.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="62114"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38195@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 15 13:12:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaT9-000G1i-6B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:12:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38166 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaT6-0004b2-6o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaSL-0004ZW-UN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaSL-0000P2-1N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:12:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaSI-0000Nd-Mo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaSI-0007Vp-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38195 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38195-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38195.157381991128861 (code B ref 38195); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2019 12:11:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaS7-0007VR-49 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:11:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:53011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVaS5-0007VC-Ak for 38195@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:11:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1573819900; bh=qgRxlViibwaMtsJ9EcYws6Yo74NWqD/ZCtnrpBHstkE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=nuwtoFq7Gpb4jwE7Y2CxtWpqTwFMogvClsW0/CvI/efRQD0pz0ewai0kWLcBFaVB8 1G8dz+v1AqnwtJ6kdWzEXeXD0AfdZaTCOydpqxQoPi8RHtbrbmZjWZkrJKimBM9MXx vY7wsfAiz426skEgF3cGPkTVWLiZYGmOLvNddBWM= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDgDS-1iexYw2F8Y-00HAZf; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:11:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pnhtlg6f.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:03:36 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7GTfvBoD6NIcUOCWMPBnO6Wf6qBQJpMKjY+Li33ykEH8RUyVA9H 5YaZSwUYolGIDXD2oeKXF3QUkC/sZK5QG+YUk5xMSBjAWen1xOPjk9ryroGVfJw7oBfIala e1irm789rQrVtwRrmgi6+/iK1+v+NV/BvXnJcWV31tpZKs4ywYjFyd78QRGOPgPKnXO+okP 74OLDqVHV4FOkax0GCqkQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:AoOFHf7bKoc=:8yjIEz2OkHNQHHnE3qo4xo YQLUQ7uHk15jt5Vi/oMUAZCQ59ypzzFlEbfNcgipTq+b8mb2pMOUEqjhJnTekUVLu2VqopTTG HBoOr0QhapereqdgX2Q96Ny7IOAHVYTXRVwxjHIm54oTe6HeWO0kQjSxwEHmyx74f6/FIAogE 9F7avhyKM0qsVRMgVm5MRkidAyDLtMUECbEt0iXC5p4OMYSdSGFl3MOufoBPNo0e1OAbmc1Sd MiwJsV5b8mrHSJ8H1+Y4PQepFHKlMIpN8em20vZMhqqgiaAYc8a8gCpExBeSbR3qcT6OdRWQd 4EL0FlJxsqfeO1Jlpr17imDl4kyRQLQENL6Nzm/QRLmwlt2KnOccwyxHFVf2inEaIZA6c9Bd1 9D74yi/3bgZwPd1jqSROzkfxeW8ux3Lh0dDRKAjxZRfU6q9MUgc5rIVxUtIBL62pRRFn9gnqJ xE9CZN6PteUDEHP5ciC0yWcrJBlfDcrlN8P6ybzaZqoqEIGgJS40EqmX4MkqXHsGtdfM3fh0p XCYlml0csD3IFDrHthK9BqFPLJP2Dl40ekVJTWqcfwvJAFQ7aOoo2M6R6DBiit5ad5CRjJhWC j0q7ZVU1jXkwHASurnxdOo8VE1ipRhV/tnEBVqeWsC7dKNlF78m0MW2gFaMv/Lo04Dav6LYXq kzvGjmAH8brZuue8vxWSvEPFMau4JIzZQMC5GCCllct7pdvVfefbDBKEZ5Gz22atG4fRaqrya btVarQ0AcAzCvNCdY6bXa/nPBuSaYGhzu9pMY70j2q/LEYQhXG+30k0yne9rRDdUB0HLTTs0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171660 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Hm, I didn't think about edebugging macros, but I guess that's also > possible? Let's see... > > (defmacro foo (x) > `(+ 1 ,x)) > > (foo 2) > > Yes indeed. You don't remember all the debug specs in macro declarations? These are all for making edebug work with these macros. > I've now adjusted the command to also do this for macrop > symbols. Looks good, thanks. > > What is the correct test here (are there even more cases to consider)? > > Hm... Are there more cases? There's special forms, but they can't be > edebugged, I think? I can't recall any more function-ey things... Autoload functions are unlikely to be edebugged. `defsubst's -- for source code they are like normal functions (i.e. covered). So let's assume these were all cases to consider. Michael.