From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Unknown Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38109: Updated Emacs to HEAD, consistently not scaling now Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:40:06 +0100 Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark Message-ID: <87wobmmkwp.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> References: <87d0e0ve29.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <20191110171241.GA60416@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <875zjj4vb7.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <20191117172208.GA63158@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <87tv72bbuz.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87pnhq5odn.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <20191117190105.GB63158@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <87blt38no5.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <20191124172612.GA5665@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <87k17p9n6y.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <20191126203655.GB7891@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20Sj=C3=83=C2=B8gren=20=3Casjo=40k?= =?UTF-8?Q?oldfront=2Edk=3E?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="60876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38109@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 26 21:41:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZheB-000Fhs-Rg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:41:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58870 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZheA-0006XY-N2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZhdv-0006XP-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZhdu-0007E2-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZhdu-0007Dp-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZhdu-000423-BZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Adam =?UTF-8?Q?Sj=C3=B8gren?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38109 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38109-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38109.157480081515431 (code B ref 38109); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38109) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2019 20:40:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZhd9-00040p-6Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: from virgil.koldfront.dk ([2.110.51.43]:48398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZhd7-00040W-HW for 38109@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from tullinup.koldfront.dk (tullinup.koldfront.dk [192.168.1.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by virgil.koldfront.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE73D16A034F5; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:40:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 virgil.koldfront.dk DE73D16A034F5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=koldfront.dk; s=mail; t=1574800806; bh=VHqZf3+iJedS1ic9Ps27ajgjTmtPSg0qKM818mk6k2w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ivThi+pw/SVvk20FDCd02VfnfjWuo2RZD7jJ0YNCulWZlx9Dyi5zN+h/M/OJl6mJR mhMj+tQZkBXaCQkFOKsplk4ihHDE5Hf3/aTq+ilbKQSVr4zSBrdzzATGsb6QoMXP8o F7k5G65oUq1WKIa17DWeDrCVwNfpWFo4h9xCoMJq/uGtMeUb3NIuJkGee1pHAUrNoZ b9vhNz2PvdXd8+cjUwWZvHhLn2Wu3eUuLDbioEGfPVX1yq9IvGqWqM2dTBLZjOr0Wk Edb70SYetEbJJVl+4/cayUKmxqEQlO6lwhM625scr2cAqFRTkFZJQ+p1vm44exoBOS HTkruEVmaronw== Original-Received: by tullinup.koldfront.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF05A20196601; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:40:06 +0100 (CET) OpenPGP: id=476630590A231909B0A0961A49D0746121BDE416; url=https://asjo.koldfront.dk/gpg.asc X-Hashcash: 1:21:191126:38109@debbugs.gnu.org::sYiPWsToiwfz14e3:00000000000000000000000000000000000000005JqX X-Hashcash: 1:21:191126:alan@idiocy.org::JS2AJXlIxTRwc03X:00Y/p3 X-Face: )qY&CseJ?.:=8F#^~GcSA?F=9eu'{KAFfL1C3/A&:nE?PW\i65"ba0NS)97, Q(^@xk}n4Ou rPuR#V8I(J_@~H($[ym:`K_+]*kjvW>xH5jbgLBVFGXY:(#4P>zVBklLbdL&XxL\M)%T}3S/IS9lMJ ^St'=VZBR (Alan Third's message of "Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:36:55 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Original-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20Sj=C3=83=C2=B8gren=20via=20=22Bu?= =?UTF-8?Q?g=20reports=20for=20GNU=20Ema?= =?UTF-8?Q?cs=2C?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20the=20Swiss=20army=20knife?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20of=20text=20editors=22=20=3Cbu?= =?UTF-8?Q?g=2Dgnu=2Demacs=40gnu=2Eorg=3E?= Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172484 Archived-At: Alan writes: > Every time I look at those screenshots I think that perhaps we should > turn off the smoothing completely, then remember I turned it on > because photos of real things looked awful without it. Good point. But hard to tell whether to smooth or not, I guess? xpm's are probably often not-photos, but png's... > Thanks for your help. Thank you for fixing the problem!