From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47431: Process Whois connection broken by remote peer. Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:19:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87wntrqs21.fsf@gnus.org> References: <835z1dp0qg.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuowopgu.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1k0ognb.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7kvok9r.fsf@gnu.org> <871rbzs70d.fsf@gnus.org> <83wntrmkja.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33724"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 47431@debbugs.gnu.org, hongyi.zhao@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 16:20:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGw-0008cf-2m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57642 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGu-00066g-Nt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGo-00066V-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGo-0001lO-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGo-0003zV-Ds for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 14:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47431-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47431.161694118615313 (code B ref 47431); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 14:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47431) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 14:19:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGY-0003yv-AZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGW-0003yf-7P for 47431@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:19:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=giMKo8kpNhxio2977yJ1qEByLaMwyrb4xOWIQvjZ76c=; b=hSB2wFUT6QMgjKPOUmBzRDoVhl kVa6GxN3QOEwfI+csbJolz7tKDxuU1e2drreRQ7WutEPLLnm4vSZzT0NirEPxSrx3QRR/HLPG+exE 9B9YMrGLLsy8X03lEe9E+VjKr0mhVRmIi3m7D1K6Q6GveV9QWKFQ+8i85r4kH8MIsF/0=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQWGN-00038o-MY; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:19:38 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEX29PKpoJ5ANjyE eXv////bjemzAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UDHA4QLku4gPIAAAGiSURBVDjLnZQJbsQg DEVZLoDhAsG+AMv979ZvA0mmlSq1HmWkzMMxvNjj3D8il9nLZJY55+AVBqZ+eZaeSsqjE1FZoOBK ClwGSHZzgK8LVAPtAZEV+LEA+7tGMBC5Zk6OOJ0MzwbyAuWAiQQBwI7rwKOY6YAhF5Jwhj4YW+K4 QA9cFbBmMA2RDch3qs6ADOQJ7wOSa647kyEqhsYLuAWwvk8qG2RdOrc9FiGaD1gxbWufdnFqct7l byAmAwGgQ9Z9QNgFSC40AOfbIzGyAtgNAE5u4PMCvMDjKrIB2A3cUaG/7GrxwZfWGA/ALwCFOQ1w Pq7wguQK6km1w6Pk7arAbjRTss6XX9oJS/FZiscBzXnSR03LmEcJbtCct0krdsCPWABaKfO1X4Fo ax8QuoHitK8Q+4DJxWogpgDwths4KMiXAqy/7Q4Dql0znhaNLAoiG/joXauBKzBh++llVwHsAljr LwC7yGiZh4LMp3dn6QWSWi65BWus/T4mVQUJPdSiNeUBpRLmHEDnVYd9fkjsxSZ8Cv4Nxu928xmN NQcP+GN8AWUfXI8JbkajAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTAzLTI4VDE0OjE2OjQ2KzAw OjAwaXGUtAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wMy0yOFQxNDoxNjo0NiswMDowMBgsLAgA AAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: The Style Council's _The Complete Adventures (2)_: "Soul Deep (Bert Bevan's Remix)" In-Reply-To: <83wntrmkja.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:15:37 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203168 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think we should simply update the list of servers we use, it sounds > like what we have is outdated. The default should be useful and > easily reachable. But I'm not an expert on this stuff. Oh, sure; we should fix whois.el. I was just wondering whether there was something odd going on in our basic networking layer here. I let the connect run for longer, and I do seem to reliably get timeouts here. It's just that they take a long time -- this one ran for about five minutes before I got: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (file-error "Failed connect" "Connection timed out") make-network-process(:name "Whois" :buffer # :host "rs.internic.net" :service 43 :nowait nil :tls-parameters nil :coding nil) That is an excessive timeout... but I guess this is up to the OS? We don't specify a timeout in the make-network-process function, I think? (It's been a while since I've read it...) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no