From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
To: 48683@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48683: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Feature suggestion gnus-summary-toggle-mark-as-processable
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 19:07:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnrjtxun.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2k0nlfeul.fsf@bochannek.com>
"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <jao@gnu.org> writes:
> On Fri, May 28 2021, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> Alex Bochannek <alex@bochannek.com> writes:
>>
>>> I have been missing a article process mark toggle for a while and would
>>> like to propose the below patch. If "+" is not an appropriate key to use
>>> for this, I am happy to accept an alternative.
>>
>> Hm. A toggle command for the process mark? I'm not quite sure I see
>> the utility, and it's unusual in a Gnus marking context -- none of the
>> other marking commands toggle (like setting the tick mark).
>
> i for one would use it. in my case, it's very common that i've marked
> an article by mistake (for instance when marking several for deletion).
>
>> And the `+' key isn't very mnemonic for a command that toggles the `#'
>> mark.
>
> i always forget it doesn't work, but my expectation is always that # on
> an already marked article would unmark it...
Same here. My hands keep doing this, despite the fact that it never
works. Given that "add mark" on an already-marked article is a no-op, it
seems like it wouldn't hurt to have it toggle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-28 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-26 19:57 bug#48683: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Feature suggestion gnus-summary-toggle-mark-as-processable Alex Bochannek
2021-05-27 23:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-28 0:13 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
2021-05-28 2:07 ` Eric Abrahamsen [this message]
2021-05-28 2:16 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-28 2:29 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2021-05-28 17:39 ` Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
2021-05-28 2:04 ` Alex Bochannek
2021-05-29 2:18 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-29 16:59 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2021-05-30 4:32 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-31 20:33 ` Alex Bochannek
2021-06-01 6:23 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-06-01 15:57 ` Alex Bochannek
2021-06-01 20:45 ` Alex Bochannek
2021-06-02 5:42 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-06-02 6:35 ` Alex Bochannek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnrjtxun.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net \
--to=eric@ericabrahamsen.net \
--cc=48683@debbugs.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).