bug#48669: Inconsistent overlay placement between minibuffer-message and set-minibuffer-message

[Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>]

tags 48669 fixed
close 48669 28.0.50
thanks

>> >> -    (let ((ol (make-overlay (point-max) (point-max) nil t t))
>> >> +    (let* ((ovpos (minibuffer--message-overlay-pos))
>> >> +           (ol (make-overlay ovpos ovpos nil t t))
>> >
>> > Doesn't this rely too much on the internal details of
>> > minibuffer--message-overlay-pos?  At least, without any comments, this
>> > call looks like a riddle that isn't easy to unlock.
>> 
>> If minibuffer--message-overlay-pos serves its purpose for
>> set-minibuffer-message, it seems suitable for
>> minibuffer-message as well.
>
> So you object to adding a comment there which would explain what that
> call does?

Now I added a comment, and pushed to master.

>> >> -              (put-text-property 0 1 'cursor t message))
>> >> +              (put-text-property 0 1 'cursor 1 message))
>> >
>> > Why this change?
>> 
>> Only to make minibuffer-message the identical copy of
>> set-minibuffer-message.
>
> I'd say make it the other way around.  Handling the 'cursor' property
> with a numeric value is more expensive and tricky than if the value is
> t, and in this case the effect is exactly the same.

So I changed the 'cursor' property to t.