From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51497: 29.0.50; (vc-print-log) broken over TRAMP Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:28:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87wnjv62ef.fsf@gnus.org> References: <877ddv9ue0.fsf@jpl.nasa.gov> <87tugyptju.fsf@gnus.org> <87tugy8h3a.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87pmrl8yhy.fsf@secretsauce.net> <60fea707-a9b2-d9f4-cc45-ffd4539887b6@yandex.ru> <87o87253sv.fsf@secretsauce.net> <60af7952-d702-d40f-928e-1320e6d9520f@yandex.ru> <83f40a2a-ae5a-2c6c-cf6a-44ff7c933d16@yandex.ru> <831r3tb7un.fsf@gnu.org> <7e04f090-81de-d5bd-746c-7f09ed0c38b0@yandex.ru> <83lf219i3u.fsf@gnu.org> <86r1btvsso.fsf@gmail.com> <86ilx4x4xv.fsf@gmail.com> <1f17978c-0498-a19b-6bb0-6f316a536f8e@yandex.ru> <83h7coa2cs.fsf@gnu.org> <92da67f0-9133-98ba-69e3-7408fab30539@yandex.ru> <83o86u7qxg.fsf@gnu.org> <5bbcd838-45a3-3d1d-5dd8-d58a0e8be4dc@yandex.ru> <838rxy7bq3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4295"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 51497@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 11:29:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LLa-0000q4-W2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:29:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42206 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LLY-0004be-S1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LLL-0004aE-Bq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LLK-00038J-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LLK-00049b-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 51497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51497.164025533915955 (code B ref 51497); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2021 10:28:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LL9-000495-Je for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:28:59 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LL8-00048m-1f for 51497@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:28:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DMopg8STzSHAVyqoLWxHU6ynLTLW16xuzR75ZcT+Vy0=; b=PTuSmHsL8fWGrJWme1ixOsuKPr k5e9WoRwxGMbSKkBgN1Df6O3d/VkksOXaFd9B0deieGZnm+hn2KEBwGuc0+JMtroFMlzyYEKcUBeV wPAPGG6AZBcwv2P7zr1BVN1Lei7Lce99X5XkR6BdswpraaioW8PQ6cS5kxvodQYA6ElA=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LKz-0000mb-7V; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:28:43 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Yves Tumor's _The Asymptotical World (EP)_: "Crushed Velvet" In-Reply-To: <838rxy7bq3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2021 20:18:12 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222974 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Even though it's plausible, I haven't encountered this particular use >> case so far. Perhaps when we do, we could mix-and-match :(literal) and >> --literal-pathspecs. > > So what would you suggest as the way forward, for both emacs-28 and > the master branches (the 2 solutions could be different)? Do you > still prefer to go with your original patch for emacs-28? This was the final message in this thread, and it was six weeks ago. I haven't paid attention to the patches in this area -- is this still an issue, or has it been fixed? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no