From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50849: 28.0.50; Proposal for Emacs daemon to signal when being busy Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:59:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87wnaj9zh9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <86czouksh2.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <83mtnykpij.fsf@gnu.org> <87tui5fdku.fsf@gnus.org> <83y27hjhy2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r10uvxr9.fsf@gnus.org> <83o7vyowcl.fsf@gnu.org> <87czceufj1.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilm6osqz.fsf@gnu.org> <87sflaszct.fsf@gnus.org> <874jxpevb6.fsf@gmail.com> <838rn1q3g9.fsf@gnu.org> <87edwsiy9p.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16651"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Visuwesh , bugs@gnu.support, 50849@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 04 13:01:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnNq-0004EV-10 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:01:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59476 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnNp-0001X0-06 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:01:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnNA-0001Tj-4e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnN8-0006AM-IT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnN8-0007KP-4y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 11:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50849 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50849-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50849.166228920428011 (code B ref 50849); Sun, 04 Sep 2022 11:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50849) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2022 11:00:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43511 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnM5-0007Gp-Of for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnM3-0007GZ-Or for 50849@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 06:59:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nq2KbOWdbwMfYbmugdMxddbs45dOBKgLbf8WwoEN/uA=; b=YsPp2pYqYqhR209mlMlR8jKwCV OnpZmnuxMbolzH4liVJjxsLraXWkdoraempqtbzWnuH/IiqcS5xY0z4l4vRumEhFoU04p5B6sHIer 89VokPOcstPU8FImz/8msxOArcC4geU0apq+Tzh3hFq1JU/6d0SsAJGFySWsyQVNCOyk=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUnLu-0000au-Or; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:59:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sat, 3 Sep 2022 08:40:16 -0700") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEX+/v7v7unt6+Xn 5t////+66/vLAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+YJBAokKEdxa5MAAAAaSURBVDjLY2AYBaNg FIwCYgCjsgAuGTq5AAAfPQA2VnN/dwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0wOS0wNFQxMDoz Njo0MCswMDowMKUHh+IAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDktMDRUMTA6MzY6NDArMDA6 MDDUWj9eAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: The Beatles's _The Beatles (1)_: "Rocky Racoon" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241491 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Hmm, is that so bad though? I'm not sure I see what problem it could > cause. Do people actually want and rely on the indefinite waiting? If you're controlling Emacs programmatically, you don't want commands to semi-randomly fail just because the Emacs is busy with the previous command. > I often do things like > > alias emacsclient="emacsclient --timeout 10" > > so I think such a flag would still be useful. It could be useful, but I think the number of people that would do something like this is minuscule, so it's marginal.