unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: "Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org>
Cc: 58984@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#58984: 29.0.50; M-x compile misinterprets libcheck error message format
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 20:24:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn858fu6.fsf@tcd.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6252DE05-F84F-4A81-BD06-3F4CF7AFCD08@acm.org> ("Mattias Engdegård"'s message of "Sun, 6 Nov 2022 15:26:51 +0100")

Mattias Engdegård [2022-11-06 15:26 +0100] wrote:

> 6 nov. 2022 kl. 13.10 skrev Basil L. Contovounesios <contovob@tcd.ie>:
>
>> The only alternative format I'm aware of is after compiling the test
>> runner in CK_SUBUNIT mode instead of CK_NORMAL or CK_ENV.
>
> If you like but I rather thought about fixing libcheck. Would
> something break if we added a space to the format string in `tr_str`?
> Ask the maintainers?

I'd have to look at the source and search their past discussions; it's
possible this has come up before.  Don't hold your breath though,
because I won't get around to this soon.  Either way I wouldn't be
particularly comfortable asking to change a default format that's
presumably been around for a while, but perhaps they can advise us
indeed.

>> In any case the feature request was to support Check's default output
>> (what we do with our small manual test suite is largely
>> inconsequential), so if that's too difficult and brittle for few gains,
>> we can close this as wontfix.
>
> You decide -- I don't think it's worth the trouble to add more contortions to
> the already much too complex `gnu` compilation-mode rule, if that is even
> possible without breaking something else or introducing major regexp
> backtracking points...

Does it have to go in the 'gnu' rule?  Is it not feasible to have it as
a separate rule?

Thanks,

-- 
Basil





  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-03 13:07 bug#58984: 29.0.50; M-x compile misinterprets libcheck error message format Basil L. Contovounesios via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-04 11:30 ` Mattias Engdegård
2022-11-04 17:08   ` Basil L. Contovounesios via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-04 17:49     ` Mattias Engdegård
2022-11-06 12:10       ` Basil L. Contovounesios via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-11-06 14:26         ` Mattias Engdegård
2022-11-08 18:24           ` Basil L. Contovounesios via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2022-11-09 11:14             ` Mattias Engdegård

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wn858fu6.fsf@tcd.ie \
    --to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=58984@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=contovob@tcd.ie \
    --cc=mattiase@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).