From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mickey Petersen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59721: 30.0.50; tab bar groups are not ordered properly Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:41:48 +0000 Organization: Mastering Emacs Message-ID: <87wn7cz3kx.fsf@masteringemacs.org> References: <87iliw206h.fsf@masteringemacs.org> <86o7soii72.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871qpk1jcl.fsf@masteringemacs.org> <86pmd4fjxh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35477"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.8.11; emacs 30.0.50 Cc: 59721@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 19:49:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0S90-00092I-0c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:49:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0S8q-0006xr-Nd; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0S8l-0006wQ-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0S8l-000860-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0S8l-00027v-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:49:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mickey Petersen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:49:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59721 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59721-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59721.16698340998131 (code B ref 59721); Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:49:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59721) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2022 18:48:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0S7z-000270-GB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-cwlgbr01on2117.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.11.117]:47617 helo=GBR01-CWL-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0S2i-00023K-Oh for 59721@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:42:51 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DjXX5h5mL1SZh8bcPA8syg2jDo0++u6awZmd9eRLtGkq0Oz33NKujQ64P8Q+1uB29MwOVHZN7gPNjAru2F4qsmjHDa1kivzTXafMimY0DFjIhWC6QcZW2QfYOSSF8PK0a0YifRELVoItjKfK+BpZD04jn2Yp0xgFrKeptcfKzrwATm9G5VDRXWQ+RQQHK90kD4tlv79NQFuQatRL+2kfI4f0IQ6va9oSjzARA08ktDxNK1Ghe2UR9Ksig7QW3/BkyMzGSxMYUqRJNLb8kOHhIpNfEg9QmDXBaAGnOr3gqSwD45v4Sv9eK7t8q1kL1Upjju6iLk5nz3gnW2yoQf3snw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=z/rjtBMxRiwp0TkHA2gm79lE+USI1wYGRFARBp/pxB8=; b=RW0mXzXfV90UlbQplnysYXDLqmyPph6AmapWD1YI5szBpZjHLGYLUTialz8mHnQlgMH7/F1mGeI2NE5XgtU0XXBRm+ILWqzI+5950x+0kkLc57z4Kv7Nhsc+K8a6CRSUjFn2vVZ8wu7uCfoZjOwb44Td+WVANofWLbfpYXi2Eqls90aQBVtaIz1dVaJJG3TaeBOk3WeR10+DC6EW+orxImZ2ddbVPYwn/QUbSitS9E6pBZ3g9inQc5ieVOpycaS5DMwcb5EhDX2M+yJPkz/4Z1e0L+xC7mwo4sIe3jeobYLrHvoeX9HDUTxwHxsds+3jWriMztBYq/UYUSz3uTqWww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 178.79.136.144) smtp.rcpttodomain=debbugs.gnu.org smtp.mailfrom=masteringemacs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=masteringemacs.org; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=masteringemacs.org; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semantical.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-semantical-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=z/rjtBMxRiwp0TkHA2gm79lE+USI1wYGRFARBp/pxB8=; b=tVHfLl5AooZLuXNkfGBESjQpOL52yuiJyqTpZPalZNLT2t/DwA0d+jPQdzkswopQp+HXI5RKhab88oYovbi00UCfi35OhgY/b2xOT73FumVZ07s7dlAvhKRI0+yl5QolB3E0NVxmYHLS7z9VvMXJDxlTdZVU7PUDGBkCEFyd32k= Original-Received: from CWLP265CA0438.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:400:1d7::18) by LO4P265MB6949.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:34e::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5857.23; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:42:41 +0000 Original-Received: from CWLGBR01FT039.eop-gbr01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10a6:400:1d7:cafe::9d) by CWLP265CA0438.outlook.office365.com (2603:10a6:400:1d7::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5857.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:42:41 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 178.79.136.144) smtp.mailfrom=masteringemacs.org; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=masteringemacs.org;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=masteringemacs.org; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of masteringemacs.org designates 178.79.136.144 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=178.79.136.144; helo=semantical.co.uk; pr=C Original-Received: from semantical.co.uk (178.79.136.144) by CWLGBR01FT039.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.40.167) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5857.22 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:42:41 +0000 Original-Received: by semantical.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 5001) id EC8C0114002; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:42:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=masteringemacs.org; s=masteringemacs.org; t=1669833760; bh=nCyGSOPv602/ZL3TR+LCwaRZoLBZwgU1md1nIuQsFsM=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=dNFclqR3YcuRLw/NEZNEJFMJrDEtYdsyW4Ro4CGt70PrFzc2vGP2tzOtqYQbflBob s7zD/X/3+UYBhCgR8RdnN8ZmxoSC3bDo2w2iAK+VKmVaOlAQrBeetIjxZg1a3w9fBf ZvqmVETVHQDusl7qA5c7oeLUXuQNddM1oux3AYU0= In-reply-to: <86pmd4fjxh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CWLGBR01FT039:EE_|LO4P265MB6949:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 6ca11278-35b9-4a1e-7112-08dad302a981 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 2SB X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:178.79.136.144; CTRY:GB; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:semantical.co.uk; PTR:semantical.co.uk; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230022)(136003)(39830400003)(376002)(396003)(346002)(451199015)(46966006)(36840700001)(86362001)(36860700001)(478600001)(36916002)(26005)(42186006)(41300700001)(8936002)(2616005)(336012)(6266002)(47076005)(5660300002)(6862004)(40480700001)(36756003)(356005)(7596003)(2906002)(7636003)(316002)(186003)(8676002)(4326008)(70586007)(70206006)(82310400005)(38230200001)(79816003)(14776008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-OriginatorOrg: masteringemacs.org X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2022 18:42:41.3105 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6ca11278-35b9-4a1e-7112-08dad302a981 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: a4e27e3d-bab0-45e8-8942-e64cf9fbd34f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=a4e27e3d-bab0-45e8-8942-e64cf9fbd34f; Ip=[178.79.136.144]; Helo=[semantical.co.uk] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CWLGBR01FT039.eop-gbr01.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: LO4P265MB6949 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:48:10 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249552 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >> I did not check if that solves it, but this issue -- >> and how I discovered it -- manifests itself when you use >> `display-buffer-in-[new]-tab' and set a tab group that way. >> >> This can result in a large amount of distinct tab group entries for >> the same tab group; does `tab-bar-tab-post-change-group-functions' >> also resolve this? > > Your guess is right. After customizing this variable and using e.g. > > (add-to-list 'display-buffer-alist > '("buffer1" . > (display-buffer-in-tab > (tab-name . "C") > (tab-group . "foo")))) > > it merges the new tab with its group. > Good stuff. Thanks, Juri. >> Because just about anybody who'd use said display buffer action would >> find themselves in this predicament and that variable (and >> subsequently adding that function to it) is... unintuitive. > > So you suggest to make this value the default? Ok, the default value > will be changed in the release branch. I feel it's what people expect to happen -- what do you think?