From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66474: No response to my emacs bug report Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 15:21:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87wmvpnxux.fsf@gmx.de> References: <1965688274.4309065.1697077337578.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1965688274.4309065.1697077337578@mail.yahoo.com> <83zg0oto70.fsf@gnu.org> <8734yggoc2.fsf@gmx.de> <1718218707.6284256.1697140654254@mail.yahoo.com> <87pm1jwplo.fsf@gmx.de> <1028396789.8098323.1697211479026@mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35444"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 66474@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lewis Creary Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 14 15:23:03 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qrebe-00092P-Ot for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 15:23:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qrebI-0000FZ-4X; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:22:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qrebG-0000FR-NF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qrebG-0000V6-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qrebd-0000Ln-Vw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66474 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66474-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66474.16972897221256 (code B ref 66474); Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66474) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2023 13:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qreaf-0000K7-Jf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:22:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:57843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qreac-0000Jm-W3 for 66474@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:22:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1697289687; x=1697894487; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=ENf+3YrKD4mkRkt1YeYjZMPDD3RGSfDCou/r1NVz5/g=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=i3kc3tvkZx14vJjD9/rf3jkbNSaekTI5ozykNyvmkP9ksZgqioMOeg9/GKeqhjTGeVst/xAU9wt KUh+iHa6y24uSudslUzkYpvn8mC5yBS6YzADmRL8yF4uyRLfA6kRpOwprRLYRe3aLG1GhCEGjRPF3 cC9NDX4XYnP4xbXBaZJhfd/2vm/iUPrz6kygk8xhlj0NHMrLuG5QkW/o2+I8HUIrRrf/XUXtz3xtd SbnVKlCIvvyQ4Oyk6nDENlmyvAjcO8vSdmztMe/CdvFsI1pCLZI2rNLjNHDkkrm6BeXHMcncl+Am2 gWXY104BXV9+x3nQwidFRFrLOoE7gkUp/zgw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.30]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEFvj-1qkG4A2NaX-00AGoO; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 15:21:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1028396789.8098323.1697211479026@mail.yahoo.com> (Lewis Creary's message of "Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:37:59 +0000 (UTC)") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:B7g+20qzrbWd/oRh9qZECZLw84JIFXDBgWvpQtVCXzO5r4zStXQ vYPA54ZK5Lj+azCoj8xn/MRVCi4Cm/YN3AcPqHrrlDr6of8DylPzmb/DNkswmEHFRP3twDD ZTNbprDAFRNPOkwC0czhmCZWEoTPR4ZmbZFjYpewChMxid04ayiDZl6aqDbtiq4QXUC57Dk xdzXBvsPL0uFh3+i6Hflw== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:mDRtPUhZHCs=;a40rjLwvDC2tf4Ppc+JgFfwKpTp LzJO3979YIYEdWsgXNKYVEl9tUjDVcuhFi677A2cBkB7R1jpFD0TvM4fjOiNjPvKYRc883Lnm vJH92nanlYpWS7DWH6DzIVu5gIlyEieWUgBxkpoPc9Oh7GcQt/Q24WEsmA85Jt8QV0sMfRdZz RDsGyl28OvbncNiUW75s/h/Rk098HutUBMY7Y05lOpG2BqqlIDX+WEiIIOkPX9TxjhU3+ySAz Ez1LoS20Ub8Z+L4ase5RMi64eH+gQpS5hT/aNfHA0TvV6IabpGaVmC85lC8ASaqKSsUCpJwOI uxLwzjUaz0NEaGrM93L0rvrRRZvYxPDHRr+Zpf4/JxNKotdgGB5SFXNam8BXtrvzTF58JStrX mTXahoy6R5bTkGyW/hOW+CQE01qMpFuQjETBdSL2f3rPcdCrECW00sR6MZvR6mVbKijJDbrd3 BBjrVZFxUSNs+OHjJ2R3K+PwH7nfhuo2US0Oa6+cb9F++d1i8plo8IWfnp3KX7x23a8C+39KH ZPNa9QOoDh2Dtjk5LtQCHsnnFYGBU/EKrpbhpWA8oeNwF851AClrNgd/WwtJhveME3B8HOgFs pMZQHCK4RDEXsFyuZVZwPpDhpzaaQQx0gKxd+I+f8m7UI16aSSj7nMbOg74q+9IWM4zBRSEA8 doMQVxxot5JOmTP5cW2g7hm5p6NBotP8Dpk80NZyMRDez8B/u5N4sPFtRNW2kihJJhSlodXgC aKS2wSVB8Sfg2QwhyNp44REmEUTd91l3zLiQQyh7GQhQmaJKjOnfln3BsMYJzzVdP/0Dr97A X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:272419 Archived-At: Lewis Creary writes: > Michael, Hi Lew, >>>> Hmm. I don't see the new message yet in the debbugs logs. > > I think I have now identified the information that will permit you to > find my bug report in the "debbugs" logs. The info is my mangled > email address, which I found in my file > c:Users/lewcr/AppData/Roaming/message-20231009-125408 -- > lewcremaceary@cs.com. If you look in the logs for this address, I > think you will find my report. There is no hit for the string "lewcremaceary" in the debbugs mailman logs. However, not all logs are based on email address. But all of them trace the Message-ID. So for a better search I need the Message-ID of a lost message. > Thanks -- Lew Best regards, Michael.