From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69010: 29.2.50; rcirc-process-regexp doesn't handle the "draft" prefix Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:28:52 +0000 Message-ID: <87wmrcyv7v.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87h6ig2qbv.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17769"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69010@debbugs.gnu.org To: Istvan Marko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 10 20:41:03 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtDi-0004RJ-IZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:41:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtDU-0004DB-1b; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:40:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtDT-0004D2-Cy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:40:47 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtDS-0001TS-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:40:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtDi-0005nC-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69010 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69010-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69010.170759401622146 (code B ref 69010); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 19:40:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtCy-0005l8-9A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:40:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:59777) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYtBn-0005hp-I7 for 69010@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540B5240027 for <69010@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:28:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1707593334; bh=ygw8uBSf567Ezq5VtUzns/1zePQE/086n5UAdNAp3ng=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=SI8ViBBe0Efr3ZkNesVHKFp9Ks0W+VHFNmXF2RSqt5zkW5TsmvC1no7To2TX9Kqoj 8SUl3BMuC6L2t54GuA5UBY2fY3SgKwW+CxjoVW8TQD/+JwUXkh5IvEy2qVEj4WgmLu tYZnoDaqDzdzMUv5WKNbY2bL9MxtzL7+KWffiGJdVmloxuixrD0XQqHbCkp/ArQ2EC wnn9s1F6lzz/rpVFW2E8hXlGZnnTBITb7aa//8VX5+c4ENj3UBTSu2eHDkvUWDuO81 3XFWXXtNZXjd4o2X9dBPF/twTTX5hmWbs2iglxS3Q1rYgycXoqROE2J8kQZvKtOphk iMYw0jf2rd44w== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TXLPK62gSz9rxG; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:28:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Istvan Marko's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2024 10:43:07 -0800") X-Hashcash: 1:20:240210:ebugs@kismala.com::RKPOXqAeDwoAffJn:5eg X-Hashcash: 1:20:240210:69010@debbugs.gnu.org::9jc9Ui9jRwUqjqOc:5gpX Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279792 Archived-At: Istvan Marko writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> Instead of hard-coding "draft", would there be an issue with replacing >> (0) with `zero-or-more'? > > That would work too, just wasn't sure how strict we want the parsing to > be. I don't have a strong opinion on the matter either, just considering alternatives. The main question I think is if the less strict approach could cause some other input to be misrecognised. A secondary question is what the consequence of a misparsed tag would be. -- Philip Kaludercic