From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69555: 30.0.50; shr - Preserve indentation when shr-fill-text is nil Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:55:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87wmq5sy8y.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87o7btzmdo.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzmhzm3v.fsf@gmail.com> <861q8onan6.fsf@gnu.org> <877cigzdo3.fsf@gmail.com> <874jdjbyvm.fsf@zohomail.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="854"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 69555@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii To: Rahguzar Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 13 20:56:52 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rkUiZ-000AXw-C0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:56:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rkUiD-0001NY-0H; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:56:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rkUiB-0001NK-VV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rkUiB-0006XY-5B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rkUik-0006Co-40 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69555 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69555-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69555.171035981423840 (code B ref 69555); Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69555) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2024 19:56:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47479 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rkUic-0006CS-0m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:56:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:47195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rkUia-0006CB-1J for 69555@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33e285a33bdso96174f8f.2 for <69555@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:56:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710359711; x=1710964511; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Zy+QPQVL1Z/PLJDmWr9SpxMWvy9OOk1UhAdyiUqbj+o=; b=jpcEOXmSbXk4zMoJlMGwMBkdCwr2OeO0x+m3WzeICLsL0PuWR9q9xT7y4tsEjRWrK9 Hj1OzqbXsq8LWZAeZ4ELf7EPfNh1zbJpISrXEmxl+RxjzIYy7lkkBHTWi6FiJkAXqR06 ZWI7w1rNJjNVQNrBaODmYmzW0PAHHeXX3O+EzbrI654YCXsWSd1c6VGdZsZ7g7h9XiDS ziLoBjXgo1F1vDoM4+w8KpY8SHVMUeHXqtlP0+8AvvSGkCUQN7l7w8SY9KhRflu6M+0L I44IZ8v2gIopuiMybVsZZBBFLEaV6NPtrPAEwrZnMPITV6GgNMoX+3mox2CD0Kk8tbTC KmaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710359711; x=1710964511; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zy+QPQVL1Z/PLJDmWr9SpxMWvy9OOk1UhAdyiUqbj+o=; b=Of/Bl4rdseMD9uYFo2kyN/xBavYZAgb/I0bQvhOOCRMwQ2RTdtCR6TX4FXyKgvShxH 3s6/5bzZzl0X5qTpcjNurJlvYVcmUS3TR4uKWW+0iDMF6/HQZYpAW2mG7UZroz+4kvoi nueGQreXkhGEqUgb5feTn8/T75n0lk8YaOERd56S8Xh+tQcM6wrv67qVTMaPQSZRSqcx /WWckbaWRkdBUbH0p72l6qJo5WGaJqy4v7IcIcbZhho9Ksvbj4iTo12tQYRCaJW/vOum nwqF+yOs1MpSgugRqZpOPp/ndx5hEHhh/imQxhQoLRqxjP2C4wQcmBIUSpACtIv7K0k3 1XWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxAlezpyraJ0CYkFsYTbL3lytP2T1vPIm+Y3IF/aLAonscinar3 JJqyOsuSPYsH11Cx8WwMK3JoK9SUz6+u71epy1EHo4MMt5Cyh3va X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEf/As0MjpMhXd1q3enohly7A78BHSd31jLICrduupt+/P0emdczuTww3GRa3SixzbS4pgiOA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd81:0:b0:33d:aaba:aa66 with SMTP id d1-20020adffd81000000b0033daabaaa66mr2217183wrr.65.1710359710621; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:55:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from amdahl30 ([2a01:e0a:253:fe0:2ef0:5dff:fed2:7b49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19-20020adfb613000000b0033dc931eb06sm12594917wre.0.2024.03.13.12.55.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:55:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874jdjbyvm.fsf@zohomail.eu> (rahguzar@zohomail.eu's message of "Wed, 06 Mar 2024 08:27:50 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:281565 Archived-At: Hey Rahguzar, Rahguzar writes: > Hi K=C3=A9vin, > > K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec writes: > >> Perhaps; I could look into adding that knob. FWIW nothing in the >> original feature request (bug#66676) gives me the impression that this >> new option should affect indentation; the stated motivation was: >> >> > 1) Using `visual-line-mode` for line wrapping. I think this is more >> > natural for html and makes resizing windows work more nicely. >> >> That's why I interpret the indentation change as a side-effect; curious >> to hear Rahguzar's thoughts though. > > You are right that losing indentation was not intentional and an > oversight on my part. Thanks for the fix. I will test it soon. No rush or anything; it just occurs to me that if you're busy with Things=E2=84=A2, please do not hesitate to delegate the testing: if you have specific use-cases or webpages in mind that you'd want to check the patch against, don't hesitate to tell me about them, I can take a look and report how things pan out.