From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:50:23 +0900 Message-ID: <87vcnuon1c.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> References: <87mxgcffq1.fsf@niu.edu> <87y5suuz85.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bopq6xng.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxgcffq1.fsf@niu.edu> <87k44ffsdu.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa5aa38p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxgcffq1.fsf@niu.edu> <87k44ffsdu.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa5aa38p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxgcffq1.fsf@niu.edu> <87k44ffsdu.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa5aa38p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y5suuz85.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bopq6xng.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vkt3yiv.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327830667 18064 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2012 09:51:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Achim Gratz , Roland Winkler To: 9113@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 10:51:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPc-0005Mr-Ef for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:51:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPb-0002SP-Mj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPY-0002S9-ED for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPX-0008AH-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:51:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPX-0008AD-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:50:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPZ-0006Gq-UM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daiki Ueno Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9113 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9113-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9113.132783064124075 (code B ref 9113); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9113) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 09:50:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPE-0006GG-BQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:50:40 -0500 Original-Received: from www10194u.sakura.ne.jp ([182.48.42.232]:32931) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRPA-0006G6-W1 for 9113@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:50:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878vkt3yiv.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:23:20 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56189 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I think we'll need something on top of EPA/EPG if we support OpenPGP > packets with libnettle, I don't think it is a good idea to expose full cryptographic functions in libnettle into Elisp, simply because there is no real use-case for them except auth-source. If you really want them and you think your problem can only be solved with that approach, I would rather suggest to add gpg-encrypt-simple and gpg-decrypt-simple in C level, which generates OpenPGP packets but only supports single fixed algorithm and parameters. So, anyway, this topic is not quite relevant to EPA/EPG from my standpoint. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno