From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10805: 24.0.93; edebug-trace t may cause stuff being inserted into current buffer Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:53:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcn97z07.fsf@web.de> References: <87y5s6l63w.fsf@web.de> <4F3A3D3C.8020002@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329263614 12323 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2012 23:53:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10805@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 00:53:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSBf-0001Qo-Gw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:53:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSBd-0004k0-Oe for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:53:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSBY-0004ji-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSBX-00084G-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:53:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSBX-000847-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:53:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSD7-0001C1-JH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10805 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10805-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10805.13292636514525 (code B ref 10805); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10805) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 23:54:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40768 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSCI-0001Aw-Am for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:54:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fmmailgate05.web.de ([217.72.192.243]:37379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxSCG-0001Aj-Ou for 10805@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from moweb001.kundenserver.de (moweb001.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.114]) by fmmailgate05.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E7969AD8BD for <10805@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:52:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from snow.dragon ([89.204.139.35]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MDxWR-1Ripy50euF-00HWME; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:52:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F3A3D3C.8020002@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:53:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:3M+NF18+9DTt7KezfEvdr0gjFJOvQ6dFQcgjdP4HHkl tZaw/MtRJYhjtfwsfoX2k59k/InV1kUpMhitbajf/oxQk0wh6y Ers/q2qnoCf6AN6a6WxW+7IOXVJANSySn4lrcoJSAcPgEsCMMM s+yLN3jA1XqzmSL686W52MNxJatnOkoTS/OUXAms2HSogsibXO EDNQidYdIY/+vbJ64z6sDKujkEi92knoox15J7XR98= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56901 Archived-At: Note that my experience with `edebug-trace' is also zero, I only tried it out, so take my comments with some care. > More or less so, yes. This is yet another incarnation of the "unless > WINDOW already is the selected window, its buffer becomes the current > buffer" problem of `select-window'. Maybe. But please keep in mind that `edebug-trace-display' is about _displaying_ a buffer. We don't want the user to edit the trace buffer, so calling `select-window' is in fact not necessary in this case. The former window is instantly re-selected by `edebug-trace-display'. Please also note (another issue, but related) that if the trace buffer is already visible in another (visible) frame, a new window pops up in the current frame nevertheless, which is kind of annoying if source files are spread over multiple frames. Thanks, Michael.