From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11258: 24.1.50; lexical binding inconsistencies Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:50:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc7i5joi.fsf@web.de> References: <87vckzsaul.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366404696 19322 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2013 20:51:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:51:36 +0000 (UTC) To: 11258@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 19 22:51:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UTIHM-0006Im-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:51:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39364 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTIHM-00009b-1d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTIHI-00009W-6i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:51:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTIHH-00061Y-92 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:51:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTIHH-00061U-5i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UTILi-0001Wv-6d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11258 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11258-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11258.13664049205784 (code B ref 11258); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11258) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2013 20:55:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UTIL2-0001VF-4I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:55:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:53727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UTIKz-0001Uv-I8 for 11258@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.130.17]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcPSk-1UvAEr1b0Q-00k2UD; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:50:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:58:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:pbIColv+Cm7mdAaU8PaXeC+cfHPSQdpNnOmH12bbL14 9q8T/gpyQnOrolPA5T3BKzFqO9ViXagMeK9veoozGbFp+eCMV9 fGCPiBec0g+XF8qJZZCJvlX8P0ytSXdvHAIcehWWRK8OhVM6OK Rtm6+O4H5D5ld+KXiwrLiomIwobGfDpI8ARCEFbItd2TPv1tDv I5JfRHqv4pGpI/wzu+Kb5Ps1U5R5k+bz+GliNYohuY= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73500 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I think the compiler is right, so the interpreter needs fixing. I'm not > completely sure it will be harmless, so it won't be fixed in 24.1. Testing my recipe today with (emacs-version) => "GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2)\n of 2013-04-10 on dex, modified by Debian", I see that the behavior is still the same. Regards, Michael.