From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17625: 24.4.50; All installed packages marked "unsigned", no archive listed Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:53:24 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87vbrnaiaz.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87tx89ffax.fsf@pellet.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <2vvbsnrgpk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403790875 8192 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2014 13:54:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17625@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daiki Ueno Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 26 15:54:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A87-0006JJ-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:54:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A87-0006hh-1x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A7v-0006gU-7E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A7m-0004uh-GA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A7m-0004ud-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A7l-00037N-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17625 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17625-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17625.140379080011909 (code B ref 17625); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17625) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2014 13:53:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A71-00035u-80 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:53:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f47.google.com ([209.85.192.47]:42474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0A6u-00035B-PC for 17625@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id q108so3007800qgd.20 for <17625@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:53:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=iOVPC40MSXumbPbkWcDVBJ9ekkdHqc0ddZEXZvaz200=; b=rSq4P5JF3iKelIla9vo3hZnL/6JQGmRAN4pQRiKzu+8ThtA/3HvbqlThnCxwkZd66V WKhATXyAvfHng13ZaWxhdELWjNtQToPoNf0muhLyG4+vYAjBR07bItOJkFQVgsf9gIEz xNmZviME0/EZ4S03TnoGNvq0YShpdI4v7ytO8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=iOVPC40MSXumbPbkWcDVBJ9ekkdHqc0ddZEXZvaz200=; b=YhFi//9BL4NAhvpX9p3d/BH0mtGozgivIuW7L0wvqRg7Q/ckPo3m6axBOrHTAfY1wH knGnYRDTTX7B2w8dvUsjQu08gt1XtrmNHBEzs7kh1AUYmxoWagRsMJcaf8sSkKJE59qA tChy28vdlsyXpUqiHFecoDkkn6Dmg6igcDnRd0thuR/HcjOKkuxKM7cyWqcgdeFWPm0o xQnPcM4Vzb4OHBXy0NrWmFUOzCCMSFdVUaovITJuE+aFuednhu3PJhwGmPMBHyikKFwo tbDF+oGr9dbNsk85bpFIGs6Z7uWkE/dOgoPn7d24nHnfWlemU1nEILokDgIQsG0P8Jh0 3eDw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmME2578N7w2I35wHFoM1cR0Bx3jBf6ChiTrJsATVMRiub0Ov/UZ3b2jEOm9ww6GfrrFgYo X-Received: by 10.224.166.73 with SMTP id l9mr22392078qay.34.1403790783039; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e8sm11351745qaa.12.2014.06.26.06.53.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:53:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Daiki Ueno's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90837 Archived-At: On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0900 Daiki Ueno wrote: DU> Stefan Monnier writes: >> There are several issues in it: >> >> 1- why have `package-desc-signed' (and the foo.signed files)? I don't >> think APT has such a feature and I'm wondering what would be >> the interest. DU> I remember it was exactly for displaying signed/unsigned status on the DU> list, requested by Ted: DU> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-10/msg00033.html DU> I'm not sure if it is useful at this point. I think you mean where I said: TZ> Any file from an archive, not just a package tarball, should be signed TZ> (especially the package index). Ted