From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17871: 24.4.50; (elisp) `Core Advising Primitives': interactive spec as function? Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:01:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbrjdajs.fsf@web.de> References: <400906ac-35f1-48e4-8df9-8e65b340209b@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404054146 31734 80.91.229.3 (29 Jun 2014 15:02:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17871@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 29 17:02:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X1GcT-0007sJ-Pl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:02:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1GcT-0004xd-Aq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:02:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1GcK-0004l4-Kd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:02:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1GcE-0001SI-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1GcE-0001SE-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1GcE-00073d-1c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17871 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17871.140405411627115 (code B ref 17871); Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2014 15:01:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36914 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1Gc7-00073F-HX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:01:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:49828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1Gc4-000731-JT for 17871@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:01:53 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.217.127.201]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LkyTl-1WTaUH3IYP-00ajVo; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:01:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <400906ac-35f1-48e4-8df9-8e65b340209b@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 29 Jun 2014 07:13:05 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ltKNYwQOXwT402vvIV9ZbmNMN78f6FtRqU77qdAXtcWknYfRjqG QSJJqHstK+p6xBbE2Asdky072OAT9lAzrCHgYbrB6Yso6SIbmRrMEAAM4BDMWSVg5ogYrsO jOcVmSNB5sMoVh17ey0iHD0+19t0v46rOkxMNKAYRYzq3mI8NvFOZv/8LDN72ZqmWoOl43+ fiDh/Y4QSP2iQSKEyHIPg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90964 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > This node says this: > > One exception: if the interactive > spec of FUNCTION is a function (rather than an expression or a > string), then the interactive spec of the combined function will > be a call to that function with as sole argument the interactive > spec of the original function. > > I'm unfamiliar with an interactive spec (i.e., the SPEC in > (interactive SPEC) being a function, rather than an expression or > a string. I cannot find anything else in the manual that refers to > this possibility. Please document this feature. Or if it is in > fact documented already, please cross-reference that location from > this node. AFAIK using a function as interactive SPEC is only useful for functions used as advices, so there is nothing to cross-reference. And the node explains well how it works. What information is missing in your opinion? Michael.