From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24128: 25.1; Strange warning from byte compiler in gud.el and gdb-mi.el Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:25:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87vazj6edf.fsf@web.de> References: <837fc0ntmw.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpk0w7ho.fsf@web.de> <831t27oq3n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470108441 21053 195.159.176.226 (2 Aug 2016 03:27:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:27:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24128@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 05:27:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQMO-00057G-Fl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:27:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53792 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQML-0001jS-1o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQMF-0001jJ-B7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQMA-0001vQ-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQMA-0001vM-8W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQMA-0002ZT-4D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24128 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24128-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24128.14701083639795 (code B ref 24128); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24128) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 03:26:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQLC-0002Xv-OJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:52985) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQL7-0002XL-Sp for 24128@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:26:01 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.67.73.210]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M8hdL-1bIElo0OMV-00wGjC; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:25:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <831t27oq3n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:35:08 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PxvZaQ/1JeqBvopBMskSavyn8JzOTbJIdqRc54AYoQg7alD/7ha C+oFRedOFy4kfhSiNIFOH7iIYvYrIMJ597387utykIUlz7FngSwyp16VsdjPfO2NxfVJ+kb NS8UL8kmpeQfa68gmzXhMYS7/ICKvzFsEGA7lPDn9g6W5bLHPT9bEuSZThIk6NNfknUXt1g isph80EjzUF3dURAwCRNg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:YMXNOQLDNto=:GXnhTMyd6e/qqjgdcYN+1N td16U35CAixlChPQtQYqscSAaPDoM6nuOLNgzjXza0TuOHQVOGK8+D/w1BB1Y5abcp5Lg8tRJ Bpxv2EerMST4ppRVwoHRmLUPH9TC/U5D3H+ofD0FjMB2ZnBAFza6J0kYkXMlcKTufLJUhWLSD wi1FpN8pzzOkMRVCMvRE19FtgmnVFW+q/YEseVMU9l6zpGgtRArCH67EvLnEdD4Y7Ar5cgXU4 iVhjD1cObfwaJf05J3AofvDDHMgQbH530GVwIlU7rz9wghanX6ZoSMw+nizaZs35qnen9ZWMU 17vX/eR0s3Poxq6UXfz0Nw4AitpjQAxdRiKtwSaLR5YUEa+s3s6Wm3se8xfODg63Z3IXXF0Mu zofb2x+orHdXYvmzRSw7oHFStRE0S0hBStyDv97l7KrrzuqlrgMIW7fqnbzYkx8k7ou5ZvIG2 vroYl6+IVDmcUXhK5gyfusbB7Yql3pTOT+rj5QHpucYuZr1mE3t/j5V+M0YzzMTihqERx/n6J BI3t2qO07YnCNTmAXJ1W0oZHHLBz31riMWqdo3qdZMEGc2jt67cksprq3hyjioxYbFmw81OVh 389CP/F0JzJr9i4R0gU5xbr1v43U7v4WrzHLE7RFPVH8CeZW4g2pmogeP4nS/FE9FVp6v+GUV uluf/plKB9zxZinZ9C3IQxEPPMIIE/jYVdwgOUC0/j9lQWUutPNjaXEn4/9gxhs+ALBzlLvnX l3lJ71exUciNYySd7AjdtX15yqhx8zNgmNWFTZ/9geKY8NMMZxKVXIdjH5wq/Ym5jwkVfKK+ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121769 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > We should make the reported line correct, then. Right? Seems the reported line number names the start of the according top-level defun. I wonder whether the compiler code knows at all to which line the reported warning exactly refers (I don't know, but somewhat doubt it). Maybe someone else can help more. Michael.