From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29157: 25.3; Eshell parsing fails sometimes, e.g. "date" and "sed" Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:41:52 -0500 Message-ID: <87vahyxcgv.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87tvy9rm5z.fsf@gmail.com> <87lgjk7rpd.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87lgjkoloe.fsf@gmail.com> <87shd5znzf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87po891o1t.fsf@gmail.com> <87po89ywv5.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360a1arlf.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgiui6qc.fsf@gmail.com> <871skmyyyh.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83wp2e6suq.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3muxgwm.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83tvxi6r78.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511646194 26078 195.159.176.226 (25 Nov 2017 21:43:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 21:43:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 29157@debbugs.gnu.org, ambrevar@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 25 22:43:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiE5-0006GG-P8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:43:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiED-0006dD-24 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:43:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiE7-0006cv-3S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:43:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiE2-0004id-7w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:43:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiE2-0004iS-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiE1-0004Gf-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 21:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29157 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29157-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29157.151164612216344 (code B ref 29157); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 21:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29157) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2017 21:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58290 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiD4-0004FY-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54]:37999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIiD2-0004F3-D0 for 29157@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:42:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n134so17121665itg.3 for <29157@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:42:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Ab4hJvhJ/IRguP003Rs1MRFEhGycWJrTYWTxVPPMkck=; b=C6dHZJq8lAARcx6p8+IPrNrieZDZ7V9gy7YhF5CNiwZslpjc132nL0a9pG1uItbaHv ltCIdtbzi7cgi0QT9k4uKwnTgvLPPZ8Akh7Z7YkvmIFKoJCk3FqLaZOQpnzyO8kKHxtG jlx7vHmldJKTwp5ntZBbGeibxM4zkxR0pBbF2fTZ+gLIc1I7xaFvPk96FkNvDkFIqyfm qHDuXAFElPpw2UF4D2sssF1YzZHzb+pn+9Ftgi7WOzrGynk8fKHJDot9uN9e9ZjOG7gP iAfEYTV1BBRlO852IOj9F32cbeZw4Br93IjMagVCt1sgOWGLn6z59hAD/CD2tpTIcmIu 8fzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Ab4hJvhJ/IRguP003Rs1MRFEhGycWJrTYWTxVPPMkck=; b=P2X8URHrYy+LglxoEPEe7RlfqpjjLghT2YgCZ5XVlD1WeMIwSojcmsxQf8jIXQqAVR vH/NmPwIeWGchCGdVSdpGhsULZnVarjhdtAYeCI4Uc1aLPZ5rM4PmGF7w67JtYbM3ql3 RXAl57MMAoDfwxtVnIM2dvwHPno5lo3FZquJ/2/Vm3XBLSz2eS+1Ysx+7eKGxDUMSVoT xaeAHvjctooTUqTrWimgnOJMzHPTy0/Re275y9HK+rLRFLguzHcs50efczSF2LQwQAi8 xlQIPf90LJcEs9ALW/8KPM76BL170LsBIqDLAhtDDzk8dkyAuuvOAU6cfxPP8668oQdb 6CbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6t2NhOsanlPTrhCDOYroEKCI4ntM18odnt76BZtnyE7gxbYS9J SiDgSBBVP4fzRLv/GIIB4WI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb2mdpKMZyctCL8ZTNqCBQwAZY14LdDiDDevcBDieEldZVTUOqEmpM+iKjG/w7d7Z2vSizfxw== X-Received: by 10.36.10.73 with SMTP id 70mr22010743itw.145.1511646114682; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:41:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e139sm5723217ioe.62.2017.11.25.13.41.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:41:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83tvxi6r78.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:25:47 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140384 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> How about checking for a set of arguments that is compatible with what >> current-time-string accepts. > > Is it really possible to do that reliably? Should be okay if we err on the side of current-time-string: (pcase (cl-list* (nth 0 args) (nth 1 args) (nthcdr 2 args))) (`(,(or (pred listp) (pred integerp)) ,(or 'nil 't 'wall (pred stringp))) t)) > Or maybe you meant to catch errors signaled by current-time-string, That's another possibility, it would be more precise. > and invoke the external command then. If so, I'd agree. But we > should then allow customization of the external command's name, > because on Windows it will be something like 'gdate', to avoid calling > the incompatible Windows shell's built-in (which also prompts > interactively for input). I'm not in front of a Windows box at the moment, but I thought a cmd.exe builtin like that could only be invoked by doing calling "cmd /C date".