From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33441: reading and printing Lisp Objects - what changed from 25.3.1 to 26.1? Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:55:15 -0400 Message-ID: <87v9zxgu1o.fsf@gmail.com> References: <837eh7hz33.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="38884"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33441@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Peter Milliken Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 01:56:25 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6mv-000A1m-By for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 01:56:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6mu-0004os-9k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:56:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6mn-0004oZ-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:56:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6mc-0000Bg-1o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6mY-00008t-DA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6mY-0003yP-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 23:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33441 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 33441-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33441.155416292515221 (code B ref 33441); Mon, 01 Apr 2019 23:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33441) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2019 23:55:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6lx-0003xR-Az for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com ([209.85.222.172]:42318) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6lv-0003xE-FX for 33441@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id b74so6822386qkg.9 for <33441@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:55:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=eADi5fTxylMj2UH2p5Ljrf0lQZ+diiSCNIukAJ6kyeA=; b=LjDo1RV/vYHeoTWLEvysxDp2O/4bHFD6X3TB3AY44zfNNqC+X/vfAbG1qyWxsFpP9+ W24XwYhdyEx4AF4dsbGtVwGX9WIDvDD4KHm1Bb/ougTtY6Jlk+ym0ModLUhk3LobGTHi TOrmw3tWp0e0tmK+7vJuVG2BHVlT/Bw/c9fnHBe987X/LQqvO3A0/dt8gIqlrsXQfsyI Vjl0e3QSR8eXxIugOt3zQFWmPhhQWwGxNeLJchJFMyIVohZwzSh77I4SIgkRkoxYLK4o Ds1SO9x0bjf31hxSGULlbS3WaO+hTVM2mjwOD+Ag+5yfRpNaGOiDKmmsHxVPp45+Hgc5 e2Bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=eADi5fTxylMj2UH2p5Ljrf0lQZ+diiSCNIukAJ6kyeA=; b=T9vj0ZtK2V9UsZlokTbiOacenp4zcjHvplIBzWr1VyyJiiThrSDQMx1fJbDa5+mauk Ws1yddmoEtwN+adTKWNWNc0YIXm6n8wlc+7FyLtuFdDoILeBD8/+1Ki8PYELv9N3sarQ SQM7kiqofD8rmFXibhRbIdaElf+RCqbKaWXnoNOXiVmmzlr8Qojb2GCuniA//QqtV0uj lolhz5Cuo+AaYBN0xTHjEdkFml7PLMSAjoiJcWJCyPSkieJlZcP0SBrEbsicA6G3w31X D6SAwwh4933dRlsq8AGtWb348W4Aop+Tlet+eZrKmCH+ZPm75FISLgorIeULNbHHZTzP hh3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWG6+rb+Vc1raMW2VxkKAzIoep4JX0vsopVrp1s4LB9vIvJwGYB bLHP9TIIlJdlkT6uQSB2BEk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfYHJldtPQ1nvbBw6N0hTeZRm9ImWXcLFa29RKdFczSNnALIXiU5Jq4AFa+oNCq9RFoaKnYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:27d4:: with SMTP id n203mr52630180qkn.105.1554162917863; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:55:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s66sm1170928qkd.90.2019.04.01.16.55.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:55:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Peter Milliken's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:21:43 +1100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157057 Archived-At: Peter Milliken writes: > I'm not sure that I am giving up on Emacs maintenance - the reference Noam > supplied indicates this is a "well known" issue and somebody, has some > intention, at some stage, to do something about it, but given the last > update to referenced bug/email stream was 268 days ago, that intention may > be on the back burner :-) Hi, I'm reviewing some old bugs, and I think I missed explicitly giving the obvious suggestion to you here the first time around. Does it help to let-bind print-circle to t in dump-language-to-file? Bug#29220 has a lot more going on because it concerns eieio-persist* functions, which as far as I can tell, your package is not using. > Faking up a code snippet is not necessarily that easy Possibly I'm missing something, but is there more to your problem than this? (defclass foo () ()) (read (prin1-to-string (make-instance 'foo))) ;=> (invalid-read-syntax "#") (read (let ((print-circle t)) (prin1-to-string (make-instance 'foo)))) ;=> #s(#s(eieio--class foo ...))