From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9454: 24.0.50; thingatpt.el should be updated to respect field boundaries Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 13:11:06 -0700 Message-ID: <87v9uqxorp.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <44787C2CD18A4D45913B6FD72C387219@us.oracle.com> <87pnl0zh7f.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="257736"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 9454@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 21 22:12:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wxn-0014qm-5x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:12:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54206 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wxl-0004Ua-RL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:12:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wxf-0004UQ-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wxe-0006a9-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wxe-0006a1-DL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wxe-0007uf-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9454 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 9454-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9454.156641827530351 (code B ref 9454); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9454) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2019 20:11:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36501 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wwt-0007tS-F9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:11:15 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wwr-0007tK-VE for 9454@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from 77.16.217.167.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.16.217.167] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Wwn-00067t-AU; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:11:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:26:34 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165517 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> Do you have a test case to reproduce this bug? > > No. > > See the original report. It points you to my > code that fixes the problem by sprinkling > `constrain-to-field' everywhere. I understand the problem conceptually, but without a test case to verify that there's a problem here in practice, it's difficult to say whether the proposed fix fixes the problem. This is why we (in the bug reporting process) encourage sending in test cases, because that makes everything easier. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no