From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>
To: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com>
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>,
36566@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Subject: bug#36566: 27.0.50; debug is sometimes horribly slow
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:54:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9tza6gg.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mufh8jj2.fsf@runbox.com> (Gemini Lasswell's message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2019 09:41:05 -0700")
Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com> writes:
> Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Improve performance of backtrace printing (bug#36566)
>>>
>>> * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-print.el (cl-print-to-string-with-limit): Reduce
>>> print-level and print-length more quickly when the structure being
>>> printed is very large.
>>
>> Is this one still needed? I tried reverting it, and it seems to make no
>> noticeable difference now (I didn't really measure though, I can't think
>> of a straightforward way of doing that), at least for the case that
>> Michael posted.
>
> My straightforward way of doing that is
>
> M-: (benchmark-run (revert-buffer)) RET
>
> while the backtrace buffer is current.
I actually get 0.9 vs 1.3 seconds (the latter being with patch 2/5
reverted) with Michael's example, which is more of a difference than I
expected based on my non-timed trials.
> I tried, with and without the patch, these steps:
>
> Navigate to org-export--prune-tree in ox.el.
> C-M-x to instrument it with Edebug.
> Open a 150K org-mode file.
> C-c C-e h H
> Edebug to line 2728 of ox.el (inside the lambda bound to 'walk-data').
> Use 'd' to get a backtrace.
> M-: (benchmark-run (revert-buffer)) RET
>
> With the patch: (0.594630583 9 0.31395808699999783)
> Without the patch: (0.925387816 15 0.5158638049999986)
>
> I would expect that debugging deeper into org-mode export (so that there
> are more frames to display containing the org parse tree) with a larger
> org-mode file would exaggerate the difference.
Alright, it's probably enough to justify this.
> Edebug is very sluggish debugging org-export--prune-tree because it is
> sending some 400K lines to the echo area, and then those make *Messages*
> redisplay slow. I will work on another patch to improve Edebug's
> behavior in this case.
>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Create common tests for print.c and cl-print.el
>>
>> Extra colon.
>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Don't build print-number-table unless it will be used
>>
>> We try not to use hashes to reference commits
>>
>
> I'll fix the patch comments as you suggest.
Okay, there's nothing more from my side, so I guess you can go ahead and
push when ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-10 3:09 bug#36566: 27.0.50; debug is sometimes horribly slow Michael Heerdegen
2019-07-10 3:18 ` Drew Adams
2019-07-10 11:20 ` Noam Postavsky
2019-07-10 22:46 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-07-14 0:02 ` Gemini Lasswell
2019-07-15 2:05 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-08-01 1:06 ` Gemini Lasswell
2019-08-01 0:53 ` Gemini Lasswell
2019-08-01 1:05 ` Noam Postavsky
2019-08-05 19:53 ` Gemini Lasswell
2019-08-19 1:30 ` Noam Postavsky
2019-09-06 16:41 ` Gemini Lasswell
2019-09-11 2:54 ` Noam Postavsky [this message]
2019-09-13 21:08 ` Gemini Lasswell
2019-09-14 13:44 ` Mauro Aranda
2019-09-14 14:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-14 14:16 ` Mauro Aranda
2019-09-14 15:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-25 14:41 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-04-25 23:23 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-04-27 0:37 ` Gemini Lasswell
2022-04-27 4:42 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-04-27 12:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-04-28 17:56 ` Gemini Lasswell
2022-05-13 16:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-14 3:57 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-05-14 11:35 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-14 13:52 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-05-14 15:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-14 16:05 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-05-14 16:18 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-14 16:54 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-14 18:55 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-05-15 12:25 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-15 13:33 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-15 16:13 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-05-15 16:25 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-15 16:52 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-05-16 1:00 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-16 1:39 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-05-16 1:44 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-05-16 12:11 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-15 7:47 ` Rudolf Schlatte
2022-05-15 12:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9tza6gg.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=npostavs@gmail.com \
--cc=36566@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=gazally@runbox.com \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).