From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#139: describe-key vs. widget red tape Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:57:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9t9bzng.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87mynwgrxb.fsf@jidanni.org> <877e5ql42d.fsf@gnus.org> <8336gedyus.fsf@gnu.org> <874l0ugrl4.fsf@gnus.org> <83sgoechsf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="270151"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 139@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Mauro Aranda Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 30 16:58:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx80-0017xN-Ia for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:58:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53404 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx7t-0008Qq-L6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57743) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx7j-0008QO-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx7i-0007gX-05 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx7h-0007gT-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx7h-0004FI-Rk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 139 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 139-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B139.156985543416230 (code B ref 139); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 139) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2019 14:57:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx6w-0004Di-9w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:57:14 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55008) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx6u-0004DY-PC for 139@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEx6p-0002Vl-BL; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:57:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Mauro Aranda's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:54:07 -0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167902 Archived-At: Mauro Aranda writes: > I took a look. Perhaps we could start with something like the attached? > The file defines a command for describing the actions associated to a > widget. One common indirection is that a widget's action might be to > tell its parent to run its action, so I tried to solve that indirection. > > To test it, load it, put point on a widget and then type: > M-x widget-describe-actions > > If that's a good start, I'm willing to work on this feature request. Great! I tried it on a random button, and I got: --- This widget type is push-button A pushable button. Action The action of this widget is [custom-reset] Mouse-down-action The mouse-down-action of this widget is [ignore] --- Perhaps more traditional would be to make the links `custom-reset' instead of [custom-reset]? Otherwise looks great to me, and I'm reopening this bug report. Could this also be extended to button.el buttons? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no