From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6491: 24.0.50; list-buffers should not throw away marks Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:58:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9ss747g.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87d3vjqtta.fsf@jidanni.org> <5C89778B3B7B41ED879CE82090933E46@us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="75849"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 6491@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:59:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkxL-000JX2-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:59:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42386 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkxJ-0007MA-VR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkxD-0007I0-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkxC-0008VC-2j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkxB-0008UW-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkxB-0004C4-Kv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6491 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 6491-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6491.157100031616074 (code B ref 6491); Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6491) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2019 20:58:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37156 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkwm-0004B7-1Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:38884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkwk-0004Ap-5O for 6491@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJkwd-0005Qk-FI; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:58:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5C89778B3B7B41ED879CE82090933E46@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:58:47 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169158 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> I think it may be logical for the marks to go away if you re-list the >> buffers, but I'm not sure. Does anybody have an opinion on this? > > Relisting (e.g. `g') does erase all marks in *Buffer List*. > > I'm not sure it should, however. Seems to me that Dired should perhaps be the > model here, and `g' does *not* erase marks in Dired. I've now made this change in Emacs 27. As for `v' removing the marks -- it's done that since forever, as far as I can see, and it's done on purpose, so I think making it stop doing that might be a behavioural change that won't be welcome. But I don't know -- does anybody have an opinion? It's trivial to fix. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no