From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38195: 27.0.50; `edebug-remove-instrumentation' doesn't work for adviced functions Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:57:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9rllggk.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87mucz98y9.fsf@web.de> <87r22brq3b.fsf@gnus.org> <87imnm9z9t.fsf@web.de> <87pnhuccbi.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="88189"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38195@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 15 09:08:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWeP-000MpQ-TS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:08:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36480 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWeO-00033S-JF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 03:08:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWUV-0001kT-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWUU-0004Hw-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWUU-0004Hp-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWUU-0003m5-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38195 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38195-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38195.157380466114483 (code B ref 38195); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2019 07:57:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWU8-0003lX-M8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:57:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWU7-0003lM-Lz for 38195@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:57:40 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVWTz-0003dq-RE; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:57:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pnhuccbi.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 23:39:29 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171635 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > But could you please update this sentence in "(elisp) Instrumenting": > > "If you want to remove Edebug instrumentation from all functions, you can > use the =E2=80=98edebug-remove-instrumentation=E2=80=99 command." The previous paragraph says: --- To remove instrumentation from a definition, simply re-evaluate its definition in a way that does not instrument. --- So while the new command can do this for one function, the salient feature is that it can do it for all functions, too. The re-evaluation thing is still easier if you just want to do it for one function, I think? --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no