From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39618: 28.0.50; gnus nnimap reports more group articles than actually exist Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:57:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9o15sbs.fsf@gnus.org> References: <877e0nlkk6.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <875zg6kuue.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877e0jwtx8.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <87eeur4lxk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871rqqwdcs.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="104789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eric Abrahamsen , 39618@debbugs.gnu.org To: Deus Max Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 20 14:05:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lW4-000Qz7-GB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:05:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41116 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lW1-0002nF-8x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lPz-0008Jj-ET for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:59:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lPy-0007Gj-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lPy-0007Ge-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lPy-0005jV-88 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39618 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39618-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39618.158220349021973 (code B ref 39618); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39618) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2020 12:58:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lP8-0005iL-65 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:58:10 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lP7-0005iA-7l for 39618@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j4lOy-0002qe-IQ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:58:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <871rqqwdcs.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> (Deus Max's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:06:59 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176278 Archived-At: Deus Max writes: > Simplifying nnimap not to keep track of local marks, may not only reduce > complexity but also take care of this problem. > If it's not needed, it's a waste. What do you think ? It's needed -- the data transferred from the IMAP server to the client is impractically large if one were to do a complete resync each time. The client keeps tracks of read/marked/etc messages, too, and just sends a QRESYNC command to the server, which means "tell me everything that's changed since last time". This is vastly more efficient. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no